Topics

Business license is property protected by the European Convention of Human Rights

JUDGMENT Gospodăria țărănească Chiper Terenti Grigore v. Democracy of Moldova 02.06.2020 (no. 71130/13) see here  SUMMARY Limits of state intervention in business activity. Mining operation permit is conceptually included in the property. The applicant company is engaged in the extraction of limestone, gravel and sand. In an investigation conducted by the competent Attorney General, the […]

read more

Collection and retention by police of non sensitive personal data of a criminal did not violate the right to privacy

JUDGMENT Ρ.Ν. v. Germany  11.06.2020 (no. 74440/17) see here   SUMMARY Personal data and police investigation. The applicant had previously been convicted of several serious offenses. A criminal prosecution was ordered again for accepting and disposing of the proceeds of crime, and the police issued an order to collect photographs of the applicant and fingerprints […]

read more

Necessity to exhaust internal remedies. States cannot be prosecuted in international courts for acts they did not have the opportunity to resolve in their own judicial systems

JUDGMENT Kaman v, Turkey  04.06.2020 (no. 29798/18) see here SUMMARY The case concerns the applicant’s custody on remand from 29 December 2017 until 25 October 2019, in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état in July 2016. The Court reiterated that the rule on the exhaustion of domestic remedies was an indispensable part of the […]

read more

Sharia and its application. Greece has one year in order to restore the right of ownership of the applicant. Measures and alternatives

GRAND CHAMBER JUDGMENT Molla Sali v. Greece  18.06.2020 (no. 20452/14) Βλ. εδώ SUMMARY The case Molla Sali v. Greece (application no. 20452/14) concerned the application by the Greek courts of Sharia law to an inheritance dispute among Greek nationals belonging to the Muslim minority. In its principal judgment delivered on 19 December 2018 by the […]

read more

The repatriation of a foreigner who did not substantiate his allegations did not violate the ECHR. Violation due to insufficient research and no granting of an interpreter.

JUDGMENT M.S v. Slovenia and Ukraine 11.06.2020  (no.  17189/11) see here  SUMMARY Asylum applicant, rights of legal representation in a language understood by the applicant, procedural obligations of the State. The applicant, passing through Ukraine illegally, was arrested at the Slovak border. Return to Ukraine as the head of the first host country, where he […]

read more

Refusal to reopen paternity proceedings dating back 40 years breached the private life of the son

JUDGMENT Boljević v. Serbia 16.06.2020 (no. 47443/14) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned the domestic courts’ refusal to reopen paternity proceedings dating to the 1970s because they were time-barred. The applicant alleged that that decision had denied him the opportunity to prove his origins via modern DNA testing methods. The Court found that, although time-limits […]

read more

Complaint of rape of a minor. Inadequate investigation and prosecution of a man accused of a more heinous crime than rape violated the procedural part of privacy and the prohibition of humiliating treatment.

JUDGMENT Z v. Bulgaria 28.05.2020  (no.  39257/17) see here  SUMMARY Ineffective judicial inquiry into vulnerable groups. Procedural part of prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment and respect for privacy. The applicant, a 13-year-old minor, complained to the competent prosecutor’s office that she had been raped by a friend of hers. He provided details and was […]

read more

Child custody and two different decisions of two different states! Involvement of the CJEU, ECtHR, Italy and Romania!

JUDGMENT S.L. and A.L. v. Italy  04.06.2020 (no. 896/16) see here   SUMMARY The case concerned child custody proceedings between parents of different nationalities (Italian and Romanian). In 2009 the first applicant’s wife brought divorce proceedings, seeking custody of her son, in the Romanian courts, while judicial separation and custody proceedings, brought by the applicant in […]

read more

Commencement of the statute of limitations for civil claims for killings in a military operation due to their widespread disclosure to the media. Violation of the right of access to a court

JUDGMENT Vujnović v. Croatia  (no. 32349/16) see here  SUMMARY The case essentially concerned the civil proceedings for damages following the death of the applicant’s parents during a military operation by the Croatian army in 1993. The applicant’s claim was ultimately dismissed as statute-barred. The applicant argued that the Supreme Court had been inconsistent when deciding […]

read more

Return, after a court decision with a delay, of confiscated drinks, when they became unsuitable for consumption. Violation of property rights

JUDGMENT Avendi OOD v. Bulgaria 04.06.2020 (no. 48786/09) βλ. εδώ  SUMMARY Seizure of goods in criminal proceedings. Irrevocable decision on their return. Delay in their return. Right to property. The applicant company is active in the trade of alcoholic beverages. After  search  26,748 liqueur bottles of Baileys was confiscated because they did not bear the […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες