Private life

Insufficient and ineffective investigation of allegations of rape violated the privacy of the victim and constituted degrading treatment

JUDGMENT E.B. v. Romania 19.03.2019 (no. 49089/10) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s complaint that her accusations of rape had not been properly investigated and that she had been deprived of her procedural rights. The Court found that the authorities had failed to carry out a proper investigation and had overly emphasised the […]

read more

The expulsion of a Moroccan national living in Italy for 20 years on grounds of public order protection has not infringed his family or private life

JUDGMENT Narjis v. Italy 14.02.2019 (no.57433/15) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the Italian authorities’ refusal to renew the residence permit of a Moroccan national (Mr Narjis) who had lived in Italy for 20 years, on the grounds that he posed a danger to society, and his expulsion to Morocco. The Court decided to examine Mr […]

read more

The unilateral presentation of a private commercial activity of a Parliamentary election candidate has violated his privacy and is not protected by the freedom of expression

JUDGMENT  Prunea v. Romania 08.01.2019 (no. 47881/11) see here SUMMARY  Freedom of expression and protection of privacy. Defamation of a Parliamentary election candidate through allegations that he has not repaid a loan he received for his election campaign. Compensation for damages from national courts. No violation of the freedom of expression, since the applicant did not […]

read more

The obligation of a spouse to give testimony to a criminal case in which his wife was a “special witness”, a stage ie before being characterised as a suspect, is contrary to the right to the protection of family life

JUDGMENT Kryževičius v. Lithuania 11.12.2018 (no. 67816/14) see here SUMMARY Witness against his wife. The applicant’s refusal to testify as a witness in a case where his wife was a “special witness”, a witness being investigated regarding her own potential criminal activity. Imposition of a fine for the refusal to testify and an inability of […]

read more

The lack of a statement of reasons for judicial decisions and the non-judicial investigation of complaints concerning individual and family life constitute a violation of Article 8 of the ECHR!

JUDGMENT A.T. v. Estonia 13.11.2018 (no. 23183/15) see here SUMMARY  Reasoning of court rulings. Judicial examination of allegations of violation of private and family life. The role of the courts. Visits of a dangerous patient in a hospital with handcuffs and legs. The ECtHR considered that because of his  history (violent, aggressive, etc.) handcuffing did […]

read more

Individual’s right to respect for reputation infringed by court judgment on harassment case against local authority

JUDGMENT  Vicent Del Campo v. Spain 6.11.2018 (no. 25527/13) see here SUMMARY The case concerned a domestic judgement which named Mr Vicent Del Campo as having harassed a work colleague, although the defendant in the case was actually his local authority employer. The Court found in particular that there had been no good reason to […]

read more
Ρομά

Attacks against Roma by members of the local community. Failure to take appropriate protective measures by the police and inadequate investigation have violated the ECHR.

JUDGMENT Burlya and others v. Ukraine 6.11.2018  (no. 3289/10) see here SUMMARY Expulsion and pillage of a Roma village in Ukraine. Lack of measures to protect homes and no objective explanation of the facts. The passivity of the police during the attack, coupled with the village council resolution on the persecution of the Roma community, […]

read more

A prisoner refused to go to his grandmother’s funeral because the van that was to carry him was small and did not have a safety belt!

JUDGMENT  Jatsõšõn v. Estonia 30.10.2018 (no. 27603/15) see here   SUMMARY A detainee in prison in Estonia asked for permission to go to his grandmother’s funeral. The prison authorities granted him a permit and a small bus for his transportation. As soon as he saw the bus, the prisoner refused to board and be transferred to […]

read more

Violent, intimidating and threatening journalistic attack on authors of the report regarding minority rights. Violation of privacy.

JUDGMENT Kaboğlu and Oran v. Turkey 30.10.2018 (no. 1759/08, 50766/10 and 50782/10) see here SUMMARY Official university report on the problems faced by minorities in Turkey. Journalists attacked the authors of the above report, using hate speech and incitement to violence with phrases such as “spilling blood”, “if we had beaten these people, people would […]

read more

The re-seizure of business related items which were handed over to the applicant’s lawyer before the latter could communicate with him did not provide sufficient guarantees against arbitrariness.

JUDGMENT Visy v. Slovakia 16.10.2018 (no.  70288/13) see here SUMMARY Investigation and confiscation of items without a legal warrant. The items were returned to the applicant’s lawyer and subsequently confiscated with a new warrant. The re-seizure of business objects, including legal documents protected by the client-client privacy relationship, which were returned to the lawyer rather […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services