Proprietorship

Unnecessary seizure for 7.5 months of computer of an non-accused violated his property and freedom of expression rights

JUDGMENT Pendov v. Bulgaria 26.03.2020 (no. 44229/11) βsee here  SUMMARY Seizure of server for 7.5 months from a person who was not indicted. Professional use for website. Right to property and freedom of expression. Restricted access to the applicant’s cultural web site on Japanese anime due to unnecessary and prolonged confiscation of his computer server […]

read more
δικηγόρος

The imposition of a permanent heating charge on disconnected users violated the right to their property.

JUDGMENT Strezovski and others v. North Macedonia 27.2.2020 (no.14460/16, 14958/16, 14962/16, 14966/16, 27884/16, 16064/17, 20229/17 and 30206/17). see here  SUMMARY The applicants are owners of houses for which they were imposed under domestic law, the continuous payment of a heating fee to a private company from which they were disconnected. The domestic courts dismissed their […]

read more
απαλλοτρίωση

Failure to pay compensation for expropriation violates the right to property. The lack of funds does not justify the no payment of the compensation.

JUDGMENT Vlastaris v. Greece 20.2.2020 (no.  43543/14) see here SUMMARY Forced expropriation in favor of the Municipality and obligation to pay compensation. A decision was taken by the Municipal Council of the Municipality of Aigaleo to force the expropriation of the applicant’s property for public benefit. According to the Constitution (Article 17), the final unit […]

read more

The Court protects lawyers from arbitrary investigations and seizures

JUDGMENT Kruglov and others v. Russia  30.01.2020 (no. 11264/04 and 15 applications)  see here  SUMMARY Investigations in law firms and homes. Protection of professional secrecy. Necessary institutional guarantees. The seizure of computers and hard drives violates the right to property. The applicants are lawyers. In order to gather evidence for a criminal investigation, a search […]

read more
απαλλοτρίωση

The plot of land was irrevocably considered as land that fell outside the forest’s boundaries. A later decision characterized it as forest. The overturning of res judicata is a breach of legal certainty.

JUDGMENT Şamat v. Turkey  21.01.2020 (no.  29115/07) see here  SUMMARY Res judicata and legal certainty. The applicants, already deceased, in 1989 and 1994 purchased a plot of land near a forest area in  Istanbul., which had already been declared non-forest by a 1979 decision. Following a recent report by the cadastral office in the area, […]

read more
ιδιοκτησία

Η άνω της 20ετίας καθυστέρηση για τον καθορισμό αποζημίωσης λόγω απαλλοτρίωσης, δημιούργησε αβεβαιότητα στους δικαιούχους και παραβίασε το δικαίωμά τους στην ιδιοκτησία

ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ Zikatanova κ.α. κατά Βουλγαρίας της 12.12.2019 (αριθ. προσφ. 45806/11) βλ. εδώ  ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ Καθυστέρηση αποζημίωσης λόγω απαλλοτρίωσης για πάνω από 20 χρόνια! Παραβίαση του δικαιώματος στην ιδιοκτησία. Οι προσφεύγοντες στερήθηκαν την γεωργική γη τους λόγω απαλλοτρίωσης  από το Υπουργείο Παιδείας. Το κράτος ακόμα και μετά την πάροδο 25 ετών, παρέλειψε να αποζημιώσει τους δικαιούχους είτε […]

read more
δικηγόρος

The seizure of computers do not consist evidence in criminal proceedings and the lengty and unnecessary retention of the seizure of assets violated the right to property

JUDGMENT OOO SK Stroykompleks and others v. Russia 17.12.2019 (no. 7896/15 and 48168/17) see here SUMMARY Proportionality principle and freezing of assets. Long and unnecessary confiscation of movable property. Violation of the right to property. The applicant companies and their principal shareholder have been frozen by their referral of the major shareholder of the companies […]

read more
απαλλοτρίωση

The right of ownership was not violated by the revocation of the transfer of immovable property acquired by a non-owner. Deprivation of property must ensure a fair balance between the general interest and the individual right

JUDGMENT Maltsev and others v. Russia 17.12.2019 (no. 77335/14, 77417/14 and 77421/14) see here  SUMMARY The applicants acquired, through purchase and distribution, ownership of agricultural parcels and registered the relevant titles in the National Land Registry. The transfer was canceled because it was proved within a reasonable time, before investing in the land they purchased, […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services