7th P – Article 4

The anti-hooligan measure not to attend sports events is not criminal but preventive. Non-application of the ne bis in idem principle

JUDGMENT  Seražin v. Croatia  8.11.2018 (no. 19120/15) see here   SUMMARY The case concerned the measures used in Croatia to fight against hooliganism. Mr Seražin, the applicant, complained under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 (right not to be tried or punished twice) that he had been prosecuted and convicted twice for causing disorder at a […]

read more

The right not to be tried or punished twice only applies to courts in one and the same State

JUDGMENT  Krombach v. France 29.03.2018 (no. 67521/14) see here SUMMARY  Ne bis in idem. The applicant was dismissed for negligence in Germany as a result of criminal proceedings against him because of non-existence of evidence and in France he was prosecuted and convicted. Application of freedom of movement under Article 4 of the 7th Additional Protocol […]

read more
δίκαιη δίκη

The perpetrator of eight terrorist attacks in Paris seeks protection in the ECHR

JUDGMENT  Ramda v. France 19.12.2017 (no. 78477/11) see here   SUMMARY  Accusations for terrorist attacks. The case concerned the reasoning of the judgment convicting the applicant delivered by an Assize Court composed exclusively of professional judges and compliance with the ne bis in idem principle in the case of a final conviction by the ordinary criminal […]

read more

No one can be tried twice for the same offense

JUDGMENT Šimkus v. Lithuania  13-06-2017 (no. 41788/11) see here  SUMMARY Ne bis in idem. Use of two different procedures (administrative and criminal) for the same facts and the same offense. The applicant was convicted in administrative proceedings for deceptive behavior in a hospital and at the same time a criminal proceeding was initiated for the […]

read more
δίκαιη δίκη

Convictions at the administrative and criminal level for the same facts are in breach of the principle of the prohibition of double prosecution or conviction

JUDGMENT Johannesson and others v. Iceland 18-05-2017 (no. 22007/11) see here  SUMMARY Ne bis in idem. The procedure concerning fines is of a criminal nature. Criminal and administrative proceedings for the same facts. Initiation of two criminal and administrative proceedings against the applicants for the same facts (imposing fines for non-tax income declaration and for […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services