Article 14

Ineffective criminal protection of homosexuals against hate speech on facebook violates their right to privacy

JUDGMENT Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania 14.01.2020 (no. 41288/15) see here SUMMARY The case raised questions about the State’s responsibility to protect individuals from homophobic hate speech. The applicants are two young men who are in a relationship. One of the applicants posted a photograph of them kissing on his Facebook page, which led to […]

read more

Horizontal reduction in non-differentiated rent allowance to woman victim of domestic violence violates the ECHR

JUDGMENT J.D. and Α v. United Kingdom 24.10.2019  (no. 32949/17 and 34614/17) see here   SUMMARY The case concerned the applicants’ complaint that new rules on housing benefit in the social housing sector (informally known as “the bedroom tax”) discriminated against them because of their particular situations: the first applicant cares for a disabled daughter while […]

read more

Refusal to grant methadone treatment to drug addicts did not violate their right to privacy

JUDGMENT Abdyusheva and others v. Russia  26/11/2019  (no. 58502/11), see here SUMMARY Public health and state protection. The opioid addicts have sought to replace the treatment they received in public hospitals with methadone and buprenorphine. The Russian state has refused because of the danger of the indicated treatment for their health, considering it inappropriate. The […]

read more

State party surveillance in order to detect endeavours hostile to the constitution. Appeals for failure to exhaust domestic remedies are inadmissible.

JUDGMENT Alternative für Deutschland v. Germany 04.07.2019 (no. 57939/18) see here  SUMMARY German party surveillance suspected of hostile endeavours against the Constitution. Non-exhaustion of internal remedies. The case concerned public comments by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution about its suspicion of endeavours hostile to the constitution by the applicant party. The Court found […]

read more

National courts in child custody cases must take into account evidence presented by a party and carry out a thorough examination of the family situation. Violation of family life.

JUDGMENT  Širvinskas v. Lithuania 23.07.2019 (no. 21243/17) see here  SUMMARY Interest of the child and arrangement of his residence in the event of divorce of his/her parents. The applicant had a daughter with his former wife. Because of personal reasons their marriage ended. The mother did not comply with the original settlement agreement of joined custody […]

read more

Inability of wheelchair user to access specific cinema in Geneva did not breach Convention protection of private life

JUDGMENT Glaisen v. Switzerland 18.07.2019 (no. 40477/13) see here SUMMARY  Person with disabilities.  Right of access to the cinema. Inability of a paraplegic wheelchair user notto gain access to a cinema in Geneva. The Court held that Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) could not be interpreted as requiring access to […]

read more

Rape, abduction and harassment of a woman from her former partner. Threats against her, cutting her car brakes with the purpose to kill and forced abortion. The Court has condemned the authorities’ indifference to domestic violence. Unfair and degrading treatment of a woman.

JUDGMENT  Volodina v. Russia 09.07.2019 (no. 41261/17) see here   SUMMARY  Domestic Violence and Discrimination Against Women. Insufficient legal status to deal with. The applicant complained that the Russian authorities had not protected her from repeated violent attacks, abductions, rapes and threat on behalf of her former partner.The Court found that the applicant had been subjected […]

read more

Disabled student. Suitable facilities and education for people with disabilities. Romania has taken adequate measures to allow access.

JUDGMENT Stoian v. Romania 25.06.2019 (no.289/14) see here SUMMARY  Disabled student. Facilities suitable and edication for people with disabilities. Romania has taken adequate measures to enable access to suitable facilities in schools for pupils with special needs and to provide adequate support for their education. The Stoian v. Romania case (No 289/14) concerned the complaints […]

read more

The unjustified restrictions on remand pre -trial prisoners’ rights in terms of family visits, violates the right to protection of family life and constitutes a prohibited discrimination.

JUDGMENT Chaldayev v. Russia 28.05.2019 (no. 33172/16) see here   SUMMARY  Pre –trial  detention of a defendant and right to visit from family. The state has no right to lay down  restrictions on visits to relatives of pre-trial prisoners that are not considered appropriate and really  necessary. The applicant was held  on pre –trial detention and before […]

read more
δικηγόρος

Refusal to grant an allowance. The deprivation of the right to be heard by the parties has violated the right to a fair trial

JUDGMENT  Elisei-Uzun and Andonie v. Romania 23.04.2019 (no. 42447/10) see here SUMMARY  Discrimination between officials. Refusal to grant allowance to specific employees of the Ministry of Justice. Failure to take part in the hearing before the Court of Appeal against the decision to grant benefits. Abolition of allowances due to constitutional legislative changes. The ECtHR […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services