1st P – Article 1


Η άνω της 20ετίας καθυστέρηση για τον καθορισμό αποζημίωσης λόγω απαλλοτρίωσης, δημιούργησε αβεβαιότητα στους δικαιούχους και παραβίασε το δικαίωμά τους στην ιδιοκτησία

ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ Zikatanova κ.α. κατά Βουλγαρίας της 12.12.2019 (αριθ. προσφ. 45806/11) βλ. εδώ  ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ Καθυστέρηση αποζημίωσης λόγω απαλλοτρίωσης για πάνω από 20 χρόνια! Παραβίαση του δικαιώματος στην ιδιοκτησία. Οι προσφεύγοντες στερήθηκαν την γεωργική γη τους λόγω απαλλοτρίωσης  από το Υπουργείο Παιδείας. Το κράτος ακόμα και μετά την πάροδο 25 ετών, παρέλειψε να αποζημιώσει τους δικαιούχους είτε […]

read more

Horizontal reduction in non-differentiated rent allowance to woman victim of domestic violence violates the ECHR

JUDGMENT J.D. and Α v. United Kingdom 24.10.2019  (no. 32949/17 and 34614/17) see here   SUMMARY The case concerned the applicants’ complaint that new rules on housing benefit in the social housing sector (informally known as “the bedroom tax”) discriminated against them because of their particular situations: the first applicant cares for a disabled daughter while […]

read more

Retroactive withdrawal of pensions that were granted over a long period, undermines legal certainty and infringes property rights

JUDGMENT Romeva v. North Macedonia 12.12.2019 (no. 32141/10) see here SUMMARY Peaceful enjoyment of property rights. Pension. Retrospective recall. Social insurance. The applicant, after legal proceedings, was granted a pension. The Fund, 7 years after retirement, re-examined the data and retrospectively withdrawn the pension without thorough scrutiny of the evidence. According to the ECtHR, any […]

read more

The seizure of computers do not consist evidence in criminal proceedings and the lengty and unnecessary retention of the seizure of assets violated the right to property

JUDGMENT OOO SK Stroykompleks and others v. Russia 17.12.2019 (no. 7896/15 and 48168/17) see here SUMMARY Proportionality principle and freezing of assets. Long and unnecessary confiscation of movable property. Violation of the right to property. The applicant companies and their principal shareholder have been frozen by their referral of the major shareholder of the companies […]

read more

The right of ownership was not violated by the revocation of the transfer of immovable property acquired by a non-owner. Deprivation of property must ensure a fair balance between the general interest and the individual right

JUDGMENT Maltsev and others v. Russia 17.12.2019 (no. 77335/14, 77417/14 and 77421/14) see here  SUMMARY The applicants acquired, through purchase and distribution, ownership of agricultural parcels and registered the relevant titles in the National Land Registry. The transfer was canceled because it was proved within a reasonable time, before investing in the land they purchased, […]

read more

The reasoned home investigation did not violate the right to privacy. Seizure of documents in order to conduct an investigation is a bearable restriction on the freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Man and others v. Romania 12.12.2019 (no.39273/07) see here SUMMARY The case originated in accusations against an investigative journalist, Liviu Aurel Man, and his team for operating a blackmailing network. The applicants, Mr Man, his wife and their media companies, brought multiple complaints under the Convention, essentially connected to the search-and-seizure operation at their […]

read more
υπερασπιστές ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων

Unjustified continuation and duration of detention (21 months), credibility of witness with motivation for personal gain, conviction of peaceful anti-government protest organizers. The Court finds multiple ECHR violations and condemns!

JUDGMENT Razvozzhayev v. Russia and Ukraine and Udaltsov v. Russia 19.11.2019 (no. 75734/12, 2695/15, 55325/15) see here  SUMMARY The case  concerned the conviction of two men for organising “mass disorder” for their part in May 2012 opposition protests and resultant disturbances in central Moscow, an incident which has been at the centre of several earlier […]

read more

Slaughter of diseased animals: lack of compensation for a company which had failed to comply with health regulations did not infringe its property rights

JUDGMENT S.A. Bio d’ Ardennes v. Belgium 12.11.2019 (no. 44457/11) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the Belgian authorities’ refusal to compensate the applicant company for the compulsory slaughter of 253 head of cattle infected with brucellosis. The Court found, among other things, that the applicant company had been refused compensation because of numerous breaches […]

read more

Forced Expropriation. The critical time for determining the final value of an expropriation compensation unit is the time the discussion takes place where the substance of the case is being investigated in court.

JUDGMENT Tsigaras v. Greece 14-11-2019 (no. 12576/12) see here  SUMMARY  Without the payment of a reasonable amount of compensation proportionate to the value of the expropriated property, deprivation of property is generally an excessive violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment. The appropriateness of the compensation would be reduced if it were to be paid […]

read more

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services