First decision of the Court against Northern Macedonia with the state’s new name. Judge and change of nationality

JUDGMENT Τasev v. North Macedonia 16.05.2019 (no. 9825/13) see here SUMMARY Change of ethnicity. Denial to a judge on his request to change his ethnicity. Removal from the list of candidates for the State Judicial Council (SJC). The Court considered in particular that the interpretation of the domestic law by the national authorities was not […]

read more

Refusal to grant an allowance. The deprivation of the right to be heard by the parties has violated the right to a fair trial

JUDGMENT  Elisei-Uzun and Andonie v. Romania 23.04.2019 (no. 42447/10) see here SUMMARY  Discrimination between officials. Refusal to grant allowance to specific employees of the Ministry of Justice. Failure to take part in the hearing before the Court of Appeal against the decision to grant benefits. Abolition of allowances due to constitutional legislative changes. The ECtHR […]

read more

National court’s refusal to seek preliminary ruling from the EU Court of justice were not arbitrary nor unreasonable, because the applicant in its first and basic set of proceedings had invoked violation, only of the domestic law of its state and not that of the EU. No violation of fair trial.

JUDGMENT Repcevirag Szövetkezet  v. Hungary  30.04.2019 (no. 70750/14)  see here   SUMMARY  National courts refusal to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling. The applicant company operating in Hungary, was convicted irrevocably for a tax offense. In response to the claims of the tax authorities, the company […]

read more

Unfair establishment of a Court of Appeal due to an illegal appointment of a judge. Infringement of Article 6 of the ECHR

JUDGMENT Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland  12.03.2019 (no.  26374/18),  see here  SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s allegation that the new Icelandic Court of Appeal (Landsréttur) was not established by law. The Court found in particular that the process by which a judge was appointed to the Court of Appeal had amounted to a flagrant […]

read more

The involvement of army officers in a court adjudicating a soldier’s lawsuit against the army makes the court non-impartial and independent

JUDGMENT  Β.Ι. v. Turkey 11.12.2018 (no.18308/10) see here   SUMMARY  Non-independent and impartial tribunal. The involvement of officers serving in military units in a court which examined a soldier’s appeal against the army can not guarantee the impartiality and independence of the tribunal. These officers remain in the service of the army, are remunerated by it, […]

read more

The authorities’ complete and prolonged failure to act following the occupation of a building by housing activists, without any legal title, breached the Convention

JUDGMENT Casa di Cura Valle Fiorita S.r.l. v. Italy 13.12.2018 (no. 67944/13) see here   SUMMARY  The case concerned the applicant company being unable to recover possession of a building in Rome that had been occupied since 2012, without any legal title, by a group of housing activists (movimento lotta per la casa). A final and enforceable judicial […]

read more

Canceling access to a court due to continuous postponements. The condemnation of the Court and how the Greek court has decided that there is no longer any reason to examine the case because of the postponements it has given itself!

JUDGMENT Frezadou v. Greece  8.11.2018 (no. 2683/12) see here   SUMMARY Application for the annulment of a nursery teacher before the Athens Administrative Court of Appeal. Termination of the trial without a decision. Right of access to a court. The applicant, a nursery teacher had applied for the position of educational coordinator abroad . She was […]

read more

Employment-related disputes are not excluded from the scope of “private life”. The dismissal of a judge from his post as President of the Court due to his inability to carry out his managerial duties.

JUDGMENT Denisov v. Ukraine 25.09.2018 (no. 6639/11) see here  SUMMARY  The case concerned the applicant’s removal from the post of president of the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal. The Court found that the way that the High Council of Justice had first dismissed Mr Denisov as president of the court owing to managerial inefficiency and […]

read more

Lack of impartiality of a court where military officers participated in its bench in a appeal against the army

JUDGMENT  Kasat v. Turkey 11.09.2018  (no.  61541/09) see here SUMMARY Medical health issue during military service and lack of impartiality on the part of the Supreme Military Administrative Court, which dismissed an action for damages against the army. No violation of the right to privacy due to adequate medical examination of the applicant by the […]

read more

Disciplinary sanctions and the violation of the fair trial by the national court that did not postpone the examination of the case and declared the Cancellation Application unacceptable

JUDGMENT Vathakos v. Greece 28.06.2018 (no. 20235/11) see here  SUMMARY  Disciplinary sanctions against a secondary school teacher for violation of professional duties. Convicted by a disciplinary court. No objection to the decision. After the expiry of the deadline for objection by the official, the Minister of Education raised an objection to the imposition of a […]

read more

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services