Administrative

δικηγόρος

A scientist was denied the title of forensic expert due to a ministerial decision decause of his posts on his personal blog. Violation of freedom of expression and fair trial due to lack of hearing.

JUDGMENT Cimperšek v. Slovenia 30.6.2020 (no.  58512/16) see here   SUMMARY The case concerned the rejection by the Minister of Justice of Mr Cimperšek’s application to become a court expert owing to a lack of the required personal qualities. The Minister referred to the contents of Mr Cimperšek’s blog and emails he had sent to complain […]

read more

Incorrect installation of gas water heater by a resident and his death. Non-infringement of the right to life

JUDGMENT Vardosanidze v. Georgia 07.05.2020 (no. 43881/10) see here SUMMARY Death due to poisoning after incorrect installation of gas water heater. Right to life. Essential and procedural part. Positive obligations of the state to protect the right to life. The applicant’s son died of carbon monoxide poisoning after reconnecting an incorrectly installed water heater to […]

read more

The European Convention on Human Rights does not apply to visa applications submitted to embassies and consulates

JUDGMENT GRAND CHAMBER M.N. and others v. Belgium 05.05.2020 (no. 3599/18) see here SUMMARY The case concerned a couple of Syrian nationals and their two children, who were refused the shortterm visas that they had requested from the Belgian Embassy in Beirut with a view to applying for asylum in Belgium. The applicants claimed that […]

read more

Prosecutors and judges have the right to criticize legal reforms and cases regarding their independence

JUDGMENT Kövesi v. Romania 05.05.2020 (no. 3594/19) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s removal as the chief prosecutor of the National Anticorruption Directorate before the end of her second term following her criticism of legislative reforms in the area of corruption. She alleged that she had also been unable to challenge that decision […]

read more

Prohibition of discribing a political party as “far-right” on television violates the freedom of expression

JUDGMENT ATV Zrt v. Hungary 28.04.2020 (no. 61178/14) see here  SUMMARY Freedom of expression and journalism. The National Media and Information Authority has banned a television company from describing a political party as “far-right” as part of a news program, as national media law has barred any “opinion” from the news presenter. The TV company […]

read more

Judicial decisions must be enforced. Inaction of the authorities regarding the non-execution and non-delivery of the property to the owner violated the fair trial

JUDGMENT Nikoloudakis v. Greece  26.3.2020 ( no. 35322/12) see here  SUMMARY Rule of law and enforcement of judgments. The applicants, by irrevocable judgments, were recognized as owners of a property owned by their mother but had been encroached upon by third parties and ordered to return the property to them and demolish the illegal buildings […]

read more
δικηγόρος

Judge versus lawyer. The unjustified assessment of an eyewitness testimony as unreliable because he was working for a lawyer and the judge’s witness testimonies as reliable, violated the fair trial

JUDGMENT Aslan Ismayilov v. Azerbaijan  12.03.2020 (no. 18498/15) see here SUMMARY Fair trial and reasoning of judicial decisions. Withdrawal of a lawyer license after disciplinary action by a court following a judge’s complaint. Failure of courts to respond to the applicant’s claims and unilateral evaluation of witness testimony against the lawyer and the complaining judge. […]

read more

Fair trial is infringed when the Turkish Football Federation Arbitration Tribunal is not independent and impartial as it is appointed and influenced by the Federation

JUDGMENT Ali Riza and others v. Turkey 28.01.2020 (no.  30226/10, 17880/11, 17887/11, 17891/11 and 5506/16) see here SUMMARY Football disputes and violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the lack of independence and impartiality of the body, the Arbitration Committee of […]

read more
δικηγόρος

The Court does not review decisions of national courts unless they are unreasonable or arbitrary

JUDGEMNT Sailing Club of Halkidiki ‘I Kelyfos’ v. Greece 21/11/2019 (applications nos. 6978/18 and 8547/18) see here   SUMMARY Halkidiki-based sailing group ” I Kellifos” has appealed to the Council of State due to a gradual increase in the mooring and berthing fees . That Court, after a series of postponements, dismissed the appeal because of a […]

read more

Non enforced housing court decision. The right to bring an action for the non-enforcement of the judgment and the existence of favorable case-law on compensation. The application is inadmissible.

JUDGMENT  Bouhamla v. France  18.07.2019 (no. 31798/16) see here SUMMARY  The case concerned the enforcement of a final judicial decision granting housing to the applicant under the law on the enforceable right to housing. The applicant was ultimately rehoused but he failed to apply to the administrative courts for compensation in respect of the period […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services