Fair trial

The conversion of a criminal charge that had been decriminalized to another with a more severe sentence and the failure to provide sufficient time to prepare the defense violated the fair trial.

JUDGMENT Gelenidze v. Georgia 07.11.2019 (no.  72916/10) see here  SUMMARY  Lenient law and unauthorized conversion of a charge. The applicant judge was convicted of intentionally miscalculating the sentence of imprisonment. Although convicted at first instance, her act under more lenient law was decriminalized. Before the Court of Appeal, the Prosecutor applied for the conversion of […]

read more

The delay or even the non-enforcement of judgments seeking the payment of delayed or unpaid salary, violated the right to property and the right to a fair trial.

JUDGMENT  Kuzhelev and others v. Russia 15.10.2019 (no.  64098/09, 64891/09, 65418/09, 67406/09, 67697/09, 66035/09 and 1504/10) see here  SUMMARY  Judgment and salary. The applicants were employed by a State shipbuilding company which was transferred  to another equivalent. The transfer was canceled, the newly formed company was put into liquidation and the employees – workers, were […]

read more
φυλακές

The non investigaton of the applicant’s allegations from the domestic courts regarding ill treatment during pre trial detention is unacceptable in behalf of the Court

JUDGMENT Almaši v. Serbia  08.10.2019 (no.  21388/15) see here  SUMMARY Ill – treatment, unreliable testimony and right to representation. The applicant was arrested for illegal entry and of people smuggling.  At the preliminary investigation stage, he alleged that he had been ill- treated,  resulting in an unreliable testimony and complained that he was not allowed […]

read more

Dismissal and disclosure of civil servants because of their membership in a communist party violated the right to privacy

JUDGMENT Polyakh and others v. Ukraine 17.10.2019 (no. 58812/15, 53217/16, 59099/16, 23231/18, and 47749/18).  see here  SUMMARY The Court first held that the first three applicants’ right to a fair trial had been violated because proceedings on their dismissal had lasted more than four and a half years and were still ongoing. As for the Article 8 […]

read more

Failure to execute a decision regaridng the mother’s custody of her children until they reach adulthood! The inactivity of the state violated family life

JUDGMENT Milovanović v. Serbia 08.10.2019  (no. 56065/10) see here  SUMMARY,  Child custody. Failure to execute a decision and state responsibilities. Violation of family life. Violation of fair trial the unreasonable length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court. The national courts irrevocably granted the exclusive custody of the two minor children to the applicant’s mother, whom […]

read more

Withdrawal of a gun licence of a person with a criminal record does not violate the ECHR

JUDGMENT Ilinca v. Romania 24.10.2019 (no. 50882/15) see here SUMMARY Withdrawal of a permit authorising the possession of firearms. Relying on Article 6 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights, Mr Ilinca submitted that the domestic courts’ decisions had lacked sufficient reasoning and had been based on secret information to which […]

read more

Spanish supermarket cashiers covertly filmed by security cameras did not suffer a violation of their privacy rights.The measure was proportionate because of a reasonable suspicion of theft.

JUDGMENT López Ribalda and others v. Spain 17.10.2019 (no. 1874/13 and 8567/13) (GRAND CHAMBER) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned the covert video-surveillance of employees which led to their dismissal. The Court found in particular that the Spanish courts had carefully balanced the rights of the applicants – supermarket employees suspected of theft – and […]

read more
δικηγόρος

Illegal protest demonstration. Demonstrator convicted twice for the same demonstration. Violation of the fundamental principle ne bis in idem.

JUDGMENT Korneyeva v. Russia 08.10.2019 ( no. 72051/17) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant being convicted of two separate offences originating in the similar circumstances of an unauthorised rally. The Court in particular rejected the Government’s argument that the duplication of the proceedings against the applicant had been justified by the distinct areas […]

read more

The finding of civil liability is not contrary to the presumption of innocence, when based on additional evidence.

JUDGMENT Fleischner v. Germany 3/10/2019 (no. 61985/12) see here SUMMARY Civil and criminal liability, obligation to pay damages. The applicant was charged with four others for abductions. The criminal proceedings against him were adjourned as ruled unfit to stand for trial, but the Civil Courts recognized the applicant’s civil liability and his obligation to pay […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services