JUDGMENT Hernehult v. Norway 10.3.2020 (no. 14652/16) and Pedersen and others v. Norway 10.3.2020 (no. 39710/15) SUMMARY Right to family life, incomplete communication, lack of effort to reunite minor children with their parents. The applicants in both cases are parents of 3 children and 1 child respectively. Due to mental illness, both were deemed inappropriate […]
Injured children by grenade in residential area. Non-assignment of responsibilities and compensation. Ineffective research
JUDGMENT Vovk and Bogdanov v. Russia 11.02.2020 (no. 15613/10) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the authorities’ alleged failure to conduct an effective investigation into the explosion of a grenade in a residential area of Chita in April 2008 and their refusal to pay the victims compensation. The Court found that the investigating authorities had […]
An eight-year-old deaf child with intellectual disabilities was tied to his bed in public care “for his own safety”. Inhuman and degrading treatment
JUDGMENT L.R. v. North Macedonia 23.01.2020 (no. 38067/15) see here SUMMARY The case concerned a child, L.R., who has been in the care of State-run institutions since he was three months old and allegations of inadequate care and ill-treatment. His case came to the notice of an NGO when the Ombudsman visited him in an […]
The removal of a child’s custody from his father, in the best interest of the child, did not violate the father’s right to family life
JUDGMENT Lacombe v. France 10.10.2019 (no. 23941/14) see here SUMMARY The case concerned proceedings for the return of a child to his mother in the United States under the Hague Convention. The Court found that the domestic courts had taken due account of the applicant’s allegations and that the decision-making process had been fair. The […]
The adoption of children against the wishes of their mothers and the failure to take family reunification measures violated their family life.
JUDGMENT A.S. v. Norway (no. 60371/15) Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379/16) SUMMARY The cases concerned decisions by the Norwegian authorities and courts to take the applicants’ children into care at a young age and then in the first case to refuse to terminate long-term foster care for the child and in the second to […]
Children born to a surrogate mother abroad. Does the refusal to register the birth certificate where it stated as the mother the “intended” mother rather than the biological one violate family life?
JUDGEMNT C and E v. France 12.12.2019 (no. 1462/18 and 7348/18) see here SUMMARY Birth through a surrogate mother and the right to have a parental relationship with the person who the child wants. Refusal by the French authorities to enter into the French register full details of birth certificates of children born through a […]
Failure to exercise the communication rights of a father with his daughter for eight years due to the mother’s opposition violated the father’s right to family life
JUDGMENT Luzi v. Italy 5.12.2019 (no. 48322/17) see here SUMMARY The applicant’s inability to exercise his right to communicate with his daughter due to the mother’s opposition. The Court found that, in view of the mother’s opposition, which had been going on for eight years, the national authorities had not taken all the necessary measures […]
The temporary deprivation of child custody from addict parents did not violate their right to family life. But the deprivation of their communication with their child violated that right.
JUDGMENT Κ.Ο. and V.M. v. Norway 19.11.2019 (no. 64808/16) see here SUMMARY Official decisions to take a couple’s daughter into care a few weeks after her birth in 2015 and their limited contact rights. The family were ultimately reunited in 2018. The Court found that the authorities had conducted an in-depth examination of the case […]