Topics

Non-release of the well-known opposition politician Selahattin Demirtaş in Turkey. The Court orders his immediate release!

GRAND CHAMBER DECISION Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey 22.12.2020 (no. 2) (app. no. 14305/17) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the arrest and pre-trial detention of Mr Selahattin Demirtaş, who at the time of the events was one of the co-chairs of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), a left-wing pro-Kurdish political party. The Court found in […]

read more
δικηγόρος

Jury statements to the media during and after the trial. Information regarding the jurors of the case from the internet. Violation of a fair trial due to doubts regarding the impartiality of a court

JUDGMENT Tikhonov and Khasis v. Russia 16.02.2021 (app. no.  12074/12 and 16442/12) see here SUMMARY In this case the applicants alleged that the court which had found them guilty of the murders of a lawyer and a journalist (killed in Moscow in 2009) had not been impartial. They based their allegations, among other things, on […]

read more

Conviction for robbery based on eyewitness testimony and cross-examination with other evidence. Non-violation of a fair trial

JUDGMENT Lamatic v. Romania 01.12.2020 (app. no. 55859/15) see here SUMMARY Fair trial and examination of witnesses. Evaluation and cross-examination of evidence. The applicant was charged with robbery, but was acquitted in the first instance court. The appellate court annulled the acquittal and convicted the applicant, based on the testimony of an eyewitness, which it […]

read more

Violation of a fair trial when tghe key witness is kept anonymous and the accused is excluded from the right to examine him.

JUDGMENT Süleyman v. Turkey 17.11.2020 (app. no. 59453/10) see here SUMMARY Right to be questioned by a key anonymous witness and a fair trial. The applicant was charged with premeditated murder. He was convicted according to the indictment. The national court based its decision on the testimony of an eyewitness who remained anonymous and the […]

read more

Hate speech and anti-Semitic comments from a Member of the Parliament. Conviction for prohibited discrimination and breach of privacy!

JUDGMENT Behar and Gutman v. Bulgaria 16.02.2021 (app. no. 29335/13) see here SUMMARY Anti-Semitic speech of a politician. Limits on freedom of expression for Members of Parliament and the balance between the right to respect for privacy and the prohibition of all racial discrimination. The two plaintiffs’ lawsuit against a politician for comments made during […]

read more

Death of a young man from police violence during an investigation. Violation of procedural and substantive part of the right to life

JUDGMENT Yukhymovych v. Ukraine 17.12.2020 (app. no. 11464/12) see here SUMMARY Police violence, limits of its exercise, ineffective investigation and right to life. Procedural and substantive part of Article 2 of the ECHR. The applicant’s son was shot dead by police officers during a police investigation into the crime in 1999. The criminal investigation into […]

read more

Refusal to provide medical assistance to a soldier resulting in his death and lack of investigation for accountability. Violation of the right to life

JUDGMENT Plokhovy v. Russia 22.12.2020 (app. no.  45024/07) see here SUMMARY Right to life and effective research. Procedural and substantive part of the right to life. The applicants’ son died while serving in the army. The deceased was perfectly healthy, but complained strongly about a discomfort, however, he was not immediately provided with medical assistance. […]

read more

Deportation of a foreigner for committing serious crimes against sexual freedom. Non-violation of the right to respect for family life

JUDGMENT J.Α. v. Switzerland 22.12.2020 (app. no. 6325/15) see here SUMMARY Deportation of a foreigner who committed serious crimes. Family ties in the host country. Proportionality of intervention. The action concerned the deportation of a Spanish national from Switzerland to Spain. The applicant had resided legally in Switzerland for a number of years, and had […]

read more

Offensive public statements of a politician against Roma saying that they were criminals, thieves, rapists, torturers! Violation of respect for their privacy

JUDGMENT Budinova and Chaprazov v. Bulgaria 16.02.2021 (app. no. 12567/13) see here SUMMARY Ethnic discrimination, Roma and the right to respect for privacy. A politician in Bulgaria made public statements on a TV channel that were derogatory to Roma living in Bulgaria. The politician, among other things, stated that he intends to clean the country […]

read more

Obligation of a public service broadcaster to broadcast an advertisement that was contrary to its interests. No violation of the freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Schweizerische Radio und Fernsehgesellschaft and publisuisse SA v. Switzerland 22.12.2020 (app. no. 41723/14) see here SUMMARY The two applicant companies in this case complained about the obligation imposed on them to run a commercial which, in their view, was damaging to their reputation. The first applicant company is a nation-wide public-service television and radio […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες