Fair trial

δικηγόρος

Conviction of the applicant by the Second Instance Court, following an appeal brought by the Prosecutor in an acquittal decision. The court has violated the principle of fair trial because it did not re-examine the co-defendants and witnesses, but was content with their initial statements.

JUDGMENT  Júlíus Þór Sigurþórsson v. Iceland 16.07.2019 (no. 38797/17) see here SUMMARY Unfair competition, criminal conviction. The applicant was accused of unfair competition on collusion between corporate materials prices. He was acquitted at first instance but the Prosecutor appealed. The Second Instance Court, although was requested, did not re-examined the co-defendants and witnesses, but relied […]

read more

Non enforced housing court decision. The right to bring an action for the non-enforcement of the judgment and the existence of favorable case-law on compensation. The application is inadmissible.

JUDGMENT  Bouhamla v. France  18.07.2019 (no. 31798/16) see here SUMMARY  The case concerned the enforcement of a final judicial decision granting housing to the applicant under the law on the enforceable right to housing. The applicant was ultimately rehoused but he failed to apply to the administrative courts for compensation in respect of the period […]

read more

Does the non compliance with the examination procedure of witnesses affect the principal of fair trial?

JUDGMENT Shala v. Switzerland 25.07.2019  (no. 63896/12) see here SUMMARY  Failure to inform criminal trial witnesses of their right to consular assistance. Intentional homicide and fair trial. No infringement. The applicant is sentenced by the Swiss courts for murder in the context of a blood feud. Complaints of infringement of fair trial. The applicant criticized […]

read more

Electronic files with millions of data in a criminal trial and fair trial. Sufficient access to information and preparation time for the defendant’s lawyer.

JUDGMENT  Rook v. Germany 25.07.2019 (no. 1586/15) see here SUMMARY  File case with electronic records with millions of data in criminal proceedings. Information of the accused and copies of the data. The case concerned the fairness of criminal proceedings where around 80,000 items of telecommunication surveillance data had been produced and 14 million electronic files seized. […]

read more

In absentia conviction. Non violation of fair trial as the absence of the convicted from the court was his choice. His detention with a view to extradition without a court order violated his right to freedom and security.

JUDGMENT Kislov v. Russia 09.07.2019 (no. 3598/10) see here   SUMMARY  Passive bribery of a civil servant. His in absentia conviction for passive bribery and forgery. Provisional detention in Russia with a view to extradition to Belarus without a court order. The applicant was accused of passive bribery of an official and was convicted in absentia […]

read more
φυλακές

Declaring part of a suspended prison sentence as served constituted sufficient redress for excessively long proceedings

JUDGMENT  Chiarello v. Germany  20-06-2019 (no. 497/17) see here SUMMARY Exceeding the length of the criminal proceedings. The Court found that the applicant could no longer claim to have been a “victim” within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, given that part of the suspended prison sentence wascharacterised by the Court as a penalty. […]

read more

Serious injury from car accident. Research on accident conditions. Archiving the case after thorough proceedings and full examination and recording of the evidence did not violate the right to life of the applicant.

JUDGMENT Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania 25.06.2019 (no. 41720/13) see here  SUMMARY  Road  traffic accident with severe body injuries. The applicant was involved in a road traffic accident when a moving car crashed  heavily into the back of his car shunting it, into the back of a parked  military lorry. He suffered serious injuries and […]

read more

Judge in litigation against administrative courts! The refusal to examine proposed witnesses, the rejection of the requested oral hearing and the inadequate statement of reasons for the judgments violated the right to a fair trial.

JUDGMENT  Bileski v. North Macedonia 06.06.2019 (no. 78392/14) see here   SUMMARY  Violation of the fair trial by the administrative courts. Reasoning of  court judgments. Denial of examination of important witnesses. Dismissal of the oral hearing of the party. Alleged co-operation with the security services of the former Communist regime. In 2012, the Fact Verification Commission […]

read more
δικηγόρος

Judge impartiality. Participation in court panel, which examined bank executives, a judge whose son was a legal advisor to the same bank, raises suspicions of a lack of impartiality. Failure to examine a witness that was not essential does not violate the fair trial.

JUDGMENT Sigurður Einarsson and others v. Iceland 04.06.19 (no. 39757/15)  see here  SUMMARY  Impartiality  ofJudge and fair trial. Not examination of witness that was not  essential. The conditions for ensuring fair trial are, inter alia, the impartiality of the judge, access to evidence and the examination of witnesses. The applicants, senior executives at Kaupping Bank, […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες