By Article

δικηγόρος

Law practice and fraud for many years. Twelve-year duration of criminal proceedings constitutes an infringement of the reasonable duration of the proceedings

JUDGMENT  Abboud v. Belgium 02.07.2019 (no.29119/13) see here  SUMMARY Violation of reasonable time for criminal proceedings. 12 years for criminal cases exceeded the reasonable time. The applicant worked as a translator. Taking advantage of this situation and without having the capacity of a lawyer, he has been conducting legal acts for many years, providing legal […]

read more

The judge must abstain when his / her impartiality is legitimately challenged. Infringement of fair trial when the judge who convicted the accused was the mother’s enemy!

JUDGMENT  Škrlj v. Croatia 11.07.2019 (no. 32953/13) see here  SUMMARY  A judge who was prejudiced against the defendant’s mother heard his case and sentenced him. Lack of fairness and fair trial. The police issued a penalty notice against the applicant for two traffic violations and he appealed before the Offences Court. At the Court of […]

read more

Conviction of a publisher and editor-in-chief of a newspaper for publishing statements by leaders of a terrorist organization for incitement to violence. Freedom of transmission of information was not infringed.

JUDGMENT Gürbüz and Bayar v. Turkey 23.07.2019 (no. 8860/13) see here  SUMMARY Press, freedom of thought and incitement to violence. The applicants, the publisher and editor-in-chief of the newspaper, were sentenced to a fine for publishing statements by a terrorist leader threatening a “guerrilla fight” in the event of no dialogue and inciting “patriots” to act. The Supreme Court […]

read more

National courts in child custody cases must take into account evidence presented by a party and carry out a thorough examination of the family situation. Violation of family life.

JUDGMENT  Širvinskas v. Lithuania 23.07.2019 (no. 21243/17) see here  SUMMARY Interest of the child and arrangement of his residence in the event of divorce of his/her parents. The applicant had a daughter with his former wife. Because of personal reasons their marriage ended. The mother did not comply with the original settlement agreement of joined custody […]

read more
δικηγόρος

Conviction of the applicant by the Second Instance Court, following an appeal brought by the Prosecutor in an acquittal decision. The court has violated the principle of fair trial because it did not re-examine the co-defendants and witnesses, but was content with their initial statements.

JUDGMENT  Júlíus Þór Sigurþórsson v. Iceland 16.07.2019 (no. 38797/17) see here SUMMARY Unfair competition, criminal conviction. The applicant was accused of unfair competition on collusion between corporate materials prices. He was acquitted at first instance but the Prosecutor appealed. The Second Instance Court, although was requested, did not re-examined the co-defendants and witnesses, but relied […]

read more

Wild beating of suspect during police interrogation for attempted rape of a minor. 8 years of ineffective investigation by the authorities regarding the conditions of the injuries constitutes inhumane and degrading treatment.

JUDGMENT  Gogaladze v. Georgia 18.07.2019 (no.8971/10) see here SUMMARY  Ill -treatment of a suspect for the offense of raping a minor by  police officers. The applicant was arrested and interrogated for the offense of the rape of a minor. Two months after the incident and while he was in pre –trial detention, he complained of […]

read more

Cases involving parent-child relationships must be handled quickly and with extreme care. The 10-year-long court process for parental custody of two minor children violated the right to family life.

JUDGMENT R.V. and others v. Italy 18.07.2019 (no. 37748/13) see here SUMMARY  Parents’ inadequacy, parental care and foster family. The applicant, following a complaint from a relative, found it unsuitable for bringing up two children aged just 1 and 3 years respectively. The procedures for taking care of children have been made long and complicated. […]

read more

Non enforced housing court decision. The right to bring an action for the non-enforcement of the judgment and the existence of favorable case-law on compensation. The application is inadmissible.

JUDGMENT  Bouhamla v. France  18.07.2019 (no. 31798/16) see here SUMMARY  The case concerned the enforcement of a final judicial decision granting housing to the applicant under the law on the enforceable right to housing. The applicant was ultimately rehoused but he failed to apply to the administrative courts for compensation in respect of the period […]

read more
απαλλοτρίωση

Fishing in a coastal basin by a fishing company that had rights in rem. Arbitrary governmental interference and eviction without payment of damages violated the right to property.

JUDGMENT Zappa S.A.S. v. Italy  04.07.2019 (no. 43842/11) see here  SUMMARY Fish farming, property rights,  state intervention. The applicant company had secured its property rights in “fishing valleys” in the province of Venice lagoon for a number of years when, after about 18 years, it received a state order to vacate those water bodies on […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες