Article 6 – Par. 3

Electronic files with millions of data in a criminal trial and fair trial. Sufficient access to information and preparation time for the defendant’s lawyer.

JUDGMENT  Rook v. Germany 25.07.2019 (no. 1586/15) see here SUMMARY  File case with electronic records with millions of data in criminal proceedings. Information of the accused and copies of the data. The case concerned the fairness of criminal proceedings where around 80,000 items of telecommunication surveillance data had been produced and 14 million electronic files seized. […]

read more
δικηγόρος

Judge impartiality. Participation in court panel, which examined bank executives, a judge whose son was a legal advisor to the same bank, raises suspicions of a lack of impartiality. Failure to examine a witness that was not essential does not violate the fair trial.

JUDGMENT Sigurður Einarsson and others v. Iceland 04.06.19 (no. 39757/15)  see here  SUMMARY  Impartiality  ofJudge and fair trial. Not examination of witness that was not  essential. The conditions for ensuring fair trial are, inter alia, the impartiality of the judge, access to evidence and the examination of witnesses. The applicants, senior executives at Kaupping Bank, […]

read more

The fabricated robbery and the non-appointment of a lawyer in the police investigation. The Court was not persuaded of the existance of a ECHR violation.

JUDGMENT Farrugia v. Malta 04.06.2019 (no. 63041/13) see here SUMMARY  Fabricated robbery. Police Prosecution without the presence of a lawyer. Following a robbery in his professional area, the applicant was questioned by the police, who suspected that the crime was based, in particular, on the allegations of one of his employees, namely that the applicant had […]

read more

Restriction on right of access to a lawyer during police interviews did not breach the right to a fair trial

JUDGMENT  Doyle v. Ireland 23.05.2019 (no. 51979/17) see here SUMMARY Access to a lawyer during police questioning. The applicant’s complaint that the right of access to a lawyer was confined during his examination by the police regarding intentional homicide. Although the applicant could consult his lawyer before and after the questioning, police practice at that […]

read more

The non-examination of a key witness in the audience trial violates the fairness of the trial and equality of arms

JUDGMENT Bondar v. Ukraine 16.04.2019 (no. 18895/08) see here SUMMARY Equality of arms. Failure to recall an important witness to an intentional homicide trial. National courts have condemned  the accused from his confession, that was optained through pressure, and did not call the key witness whose examination was crucial to the conviction or not. Unfair […]

read more
δικηγόρος

The removal of the lawyer from the police because he informed the accused of his rights to silence and non-self-incrimination. The active and guaranteeing role of the lawyer in criminal proceedings is important.

JUDGMENT Soytemiz v. Turkey 27.11.2018 (no. 57837/09) see here    SUMMARY Criminal proceedings for the offense of assisting in the illegal organization of the Turkish Revolutionary Party. The role of advocates. Right to silence and non-self-incrimination in the pre-trial proceedings. The removal and replace the officially appointed lawyer of the accused because he has informed him […]

read more

Rejection of a defendant’s request for expert examination violated his defense right to examine witnesses.

JUDGMENT Avagyan v. Armenia 22.11.2018  (no. 1837/10) see here   SUMMARY  An accused of manslaughter of two brothers with poisoning during his trial asked the experts to come in order for them to examine them. The reasoning put forward was that there were contradictory and conflicting expert reports on the cause of the deaths of the […]

read more

Undercovered police officers are presented as drug dealers aiming at arresting the actual perpetrators. Is an unlawful secret police operation compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights in order to verify the offense of drug trafficking?

JUDGMENT  Guerni v. Belgium 23.10.2018 (no.  19291/07) see here SUMMARY  The case concerned criminal proceedings under which Mr Guerni had been convicted of drug trafficking. In the framework of their investigations, the police had been authorised to call on the services of an informer and an undercover agent posing as a purchaser. The Court found […]

read more
δίκαιη δίκη

Interpreting in Russian for a Lithuanian in Slovenia violated fair trial right

JUDGMENT  Vizgirda v. Slovenia 28.08.2018 (no. 59868/08) see here SUMMARY  Appointment of a Russian-language interpreter to a Lithuanian citizen without him having adequate understanding of the Russian language. Failure to lodge a complaint or protest by the applicant and his lawyer on the appointment of a Russian interpreter. The Court considered that the absence of […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services