JUDGMENT Pinkas and others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 04.10.2022 (app. no. 8701/21 ) see here SUMMARY The applicants, a group of 51 judicial clerks at the State Court, brought a joint civil action with judges from the same court, seeking payment of meal, travel and family separation allowances from 2009 onwards, on the basis of […]
JUDGMENT Χ. and others v. Albania 31.05.2022 (app. no. 73548/17 and 45521/19) see here SUMMARY Prohibition of racial segregation. Coexistence of different ethnicities in the school community. The applicants belong to Roma and Egyptian families. Food programs for the children of these minorities were given as an incentive for them to enroll in school. However, […]
JUDGMENT Negovanovic and others v. Serbia 25.01.22 (app. no. 29907/16 amd 3 others) see here SUMMARY The case concerned alleged discrimination by the Serbian authorities against blind chess players, its own nationals, who had won medals at major international events, notably in the Blind Chess Olympiad. Unlike other Serbian athletes with disabilities and sighted chess […]
JUDGMENT Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia 26.10.2021 (app. no. 34591/19 and 42545/19) see here SUMMARY Disability. Non-discrimination. Appropriate measures for the participation of disabled people in the elections. Effective remedies According to the Strasbourg Court, disability is considered a prohibited cause of discrimination. The applicants, who have muscular dystrophy, complained through their appeal about the […]
JUDGMENT Association ACCEPT and others v. Romania 01.06.2021 (app. no. 19237/16) see here SUMMARY The case concerned a demonstration that had occurred at a screening of a film involving a same-sex family during the applicant association’s LGBT History Month in February 2013. The other five applicants had attended the screening. Although the police had provided […]
JUDGMENT Napotnik v. Romania 20-10-2020 (app. no. 33139/13) see here SUMMARY The case concerned a diplomat’s allegation that she had been recalled from her post in the Romanian Embassy in Ljubljana because she was pregnant. The Court found that the applicant had been treated differently on grounds of sex, but that the domestic authorities had […]
JUDGMENT REGARDING INTERIM MEASURES Gyulumyan and others v. Armenia 08.07.2020 (no. 25240/20) SUMMARY Non-renewable term in the constitutional court and the need to take interim measures due to impending irreparable damage to judges. In 2015, the Constitution of Armenia was revised, introducing a 12-year non-renewable term for the judges of the Constitutional Court and establishing […]
Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.
Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.