JUDGMENT Papargyriou v. Greece 21.11.2019 (no. 55846/15) see here SUMMARY Failure to grant just satisfaction under Greek law for the excessive length of the criminal proceedings before the investigating authorities. In particular, the Court found that the procedure, which lasted more than 10 years and nine months at the pre-trial level, was too long, in […]
JUDGMENT Κ.Ο. and V.M. v. Norway 19.11.2019 (no. 64808/16) see here SUMMARY Official decisions to take a couple’s daughter into care a few weeks after her birth in 2015 and their limited contact rights. The family were ultimately reunited in 2018. The Court found that the authorities had conducted an in-depth examination of the case […]
JUDGMENT Obote v. Russia 19.11.2019 (no. 58954/09) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s prosecution for taking part in a flash mob, which the courts viewed as a static demonstration requiring previous notification. The Court considered the flash mob a “peaceful assembly” and found that the reasons given by the domestic authorities to justify […]
JUDGMENT Adamčo v. Slovakia 12.11.2019 (no. 45084/14) see here SUMMARY Reliability of witnesses, access to the case file and fair trial. The applicant was first acquitted of the charge of complicity in homicide. An appeal was filed by the Prosecutor who converted the charge from a mere accomplice to a perpetrator and was convicted by a […]
JUDGMENT Ν.Α. v. Finland 14.11.2019 (no. 25244/18) see here SUMMARY The Court found in particular that the Finnish authorities had not carried out a thorough enough assessment of the individual risks faced by the applicant’s father in Iraq although they had accepted his account of having faced two near deadly attacks in a context of […]
JUDGMENT S.A. Bio d’ Ardennes v. Belgium 12.11.2019 (no. 44457/11) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the Belgian authorities’ refusal to compensate the applicant company for the compulsory slaughter of 253 head of cattle infected with brucellosis. The Court found, among other things, that the applicant company had been refused compensation because of numerous breaches […]
JUDGMENT Tsigaras v. Greece 14-11-2019 (no. 12576/12) see here SUMMARY Without the payment of a reasonable amount of compensation proportionate to the value of the expropriated property, deprivation of property is generally an excessive violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment. The appropriateness of the compensation would be reduced if it were to be paid […]
JUDGMENT Α. v. Russia 12.11.2019 (no. 37735/09) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s allegation that she had been traumatised by witnessing her father’s violent arrest by the police when she was nine years old. The Court found that the applicant’s allegations were credible, but that the authorities’ only response had been to carry […]
JUDGMENT Gelenidze v. Georgia 07.11.2019 (no. 72916/10) see here SUMMARY Lenient law and unauthorized conversion of a charge. The applicant judge was convicted of intentionally miscalculating the sentence of imprisonment. Although convicted at first instance, her act under more lenient law was decriminalized. Before the Court of Appeal, the Prosecutor applied for the conversion of […]
/JUDGMENT Apostolovi v. Bulgaria 07.11.2019 (no. 32644/09) see here SUMMARY The principle of proportionality in the freezing of assets. The applicants had all their assets freezed in connection with a pending criminal case against the first applicant for a bank offense. Before the Court of First Instance they demanded the freezing order to be lift […]
Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.
Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.