1st P – Article 1

Mandatory rental agreements for retirees and the homeless. Violation of the right to the lessor’s property

JUDGMENT Kasmi v. Albania  23.06.2020 (no. 1175/06) see here SUMMARY Forced rent for the homeless. Right to the lessor’s property. The plaintiff was obliged by an irrevocable decision of the Supreme Court to impose compulsory leases on apartments owned by him, which had been concluded during the nationalization of his property, but remained active even […]

read more

Business license is property protected by the European Convention of Human Rights

JUDGMENT Gospodăria țărănească Chiper Terenti Grigore v. Democracy of Moldova 02.06.2020 (no. 71130/13) see here  SUMMARY Limits of state intervention in business activity. Mining operation permit is conceptually included in the property. The applicant company is engaged in the extraction of limestone, gravel and sand. In an investigation conducted by the competent Attorney General, the […]

read more

Sharia and its application. Greece has one year in order to restore the right of ownership of the applicant. Measures and alternatives

GRAND CHAMBER JUDGMENT Molla Sali v. Greece  18.06.2020 (no. 20452/14) Βλ. εδώ SUMMARY The case Molla Sali v. Greece (application no. 20452/14) concerned the application by the Greek courts of Sharia law to an inheritance dispute among Greek nationals belonging to the Muslim minority. In its principal judgment delivered on 19 December 2018 by the […]

read more

Return, after a court decision with a delay, of confiscated drinks, when they became unsuitable for consumption. Violation of property rights

JUDGMENT Avendi OOD v. Bulgaria 04.06.2020 (no. 48786/09) βλ. εδώ  SUMMARY Seizure of goods in criminal proceedings. Irrevocable decision on their return. Delay in their return. Right to property. The applicant company is active in the trade of alcoholic beverages. After  search  26,748 liqueur bottles of Baileys was confiscated because they did not bear the […]

read more
απαλλοτρίωση

Expropriation. Attorneys have the right to file a direct action to seek redress and the attorney’s fees.

JUDGMENT Kandarakis v. Greece 11.06.2020 (no. 48345/12, 48348/12 and 67463/12) see here SUMMARY Payment of legal remuneration and court costs. Right of access. Lawyers’ rights. Rejection, for lack of active legal standing, of the lawyers claim who represented their clients in a case of expropriation. The lawyers demanded that the debtor company deposit the awarded […]

read more

The delay in the return of unduly paid taxes and the unnecessary judicial actions of the tax authorities violated the right to property of the taxpayer!

JUDGMENT Antonov v. Bulgaria  28.05.2020 (appl. no. 58364/10) see here  SUMMARY Tax refund and delay in court decision enforcement. A large amount of taxes was wrongly charged to the applicant. He appealed before the domestic courts, which acquitted him and ordered the competent tax authority to return the money. Nevertheless, the tax authority, without providing […]

read more

Failure to provide medical care to detainees constitutes inhumane and degrading treatment.

JUDGMENT Kadagishvili v. Georgia 14.05.2020 ( no. 12391/06) see here   SUMMARY Failure to provide medical care to detainees in accordance with their health problems is inhumane and degrading treatment. Detention of detainees and conditions of a fair trial. The first and third applicants were convicted of money laundering and held in high-security prisons. They […]

read more
ιδιοκτησία

Seizure of property of an alleged kidnapped victim, when the victim herself stated that she was not a victim and that there was no kidnapping! Violation of property rights.

JUDGMENT Litvinenko v. Russia 05.05.2020 (no. 84447/17) see here  SUMMARY Seizure of property as part of a criminal investigation by the alleged abducted victim. Authorities seized the applicant’s property, which was allegedly the victim of an abduction from unknown criminals, in order to prevent the perpetrators from illegally disposing of her property. The applicant had […]

read more

Lack of capital is not a legitimate reason for a reduction in government allowance for the purchase of housing. Violation of the right to property

JUDGMENT Nechayeva v. Russia 12.05.2020 (no. 18921/15) see here  SUMMARY State allownace for the purchase of a first home, state budget and the right to property. The applicant mother of 4 children was judged by the competent committee of the Ministry of Labor to be eligible for a grant to purchase a house. The commission […]

read more
απαλλοτρίωση

The retroactive application of a law by which the owners receive within a time-frame of 10 years as compensation for expropriation 10% of the value of the property does not violate the ECHR! An alarming decision by the Court

JUDGMENT Beshiri v. Albania 07.05.2020 ( application no. 29026/06 and 11 other applications) see here   SUMMARY The applicants were real estate owners whose property were expropriated for reasons of public interest. For a long time they had not been compensated and although they had succeeded in issuing irrevocable decisions that gave justice to them,  they […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες