ECHRCaseLaw

The application before the ECHR is inadmissible because the internal remedies have not been exhausted, even when an internal appeal has been lodged, but was vague.

JUDGMENT Hernádi v. Croatia 26/09/2019 (no. 29998/15) see here  SUMMARY Exhaustion of domestic remedies. The applicant, a resident of Hungary, was charged with bribery and a temporary detention order and a European arrest warrant for extradition to Croatia were issued by the Croatian authorities. He brought two actions before the Constitutional Court which were dismissed […]

read more

Request for the replacement of the sentence in the context of the transfer of detainees from Morocco to France. The principle “no punishment without law” does not apply to the enforcement of the sentence.

JUDGMENT Robert v. France 26/09/2019 (no. 1652/16) see here SUMMARY Execution of sentence and principle of “nulla poena sine lege”. Replacement of the sentence issued by the Moroccan courts for a French prisoner in the course of his transfer to France in order to serve his sentence. The Court held in particular that Articles 6 […]

read more

Failure to hear the applicant and witnesses on appeal flouted the requirements of the right to a fair trial.

JUDGMENT Camacho Camacho v. Spain 24/09/2019 (application no.  32914/16) see here SUMMARY Fair trial and the principle of adversarial  hearing. The applicant was charged with assaulting his ex-wife. He was acquitted at  first instance but  the public prosecutor  appealed . He was sentenced to imprisonment and fined, even though he and several witnesses had never been […]

read more

The phrase “you are the most idiotic politician I know” is protected by the freedom of expression and constitutes political criticism.

JUDGMENT Antunes Emídio v. Portugal Soares Gomes da Cruz v. Portugal (no. 75637/13 and 8114/14) see here  SUMMARY Criticism of public figures with phrases such as “he is the most idiotic politician I know”, “only chickens were left”, “distinguished for his lack of character and honesty and his cowardice””. Conviction and imposition of a fine […]

read more

Right of access to the case file with a view to appeal before the ECtHR. Obstructing it constitutes an infringement of the right of appeal.

JUDGMENT Akif Hasanov v. Azerbaijan 19/09/2019 (no. 7268/10) see here  SUMMARY Deadline for appeal and access to the documents in the case file. The applicant was sentenced to 5 days in prison for hooliganism. He  appealed but he was never called  to the hearing and was never served with the dismissal decision. He appealed before […]

read more

The applicant was not aware of the other party’s allegations to respond them in hers child custody case law. Violation equality of arms.

JUDGMENT Andersena v. Latvia of 19.09.2019 (no. 79441/17) see here SUMMARY Adversarial proceedings, equality of arms and the right to family life. The applicant moved from the family home with her daughter to another country. The father filed a lawsuit and won the child’s return to his place of residence. In the proceedings before the Court, the applicant […]

read more

Unfair interventions in schools violated the basic rights of students, parents and teachers in education, privacy and personal freedom.

JUDGMENT Iovcev and others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia 17.09.2019 (no. 40942/14) see here SUMMARY Teacher intimidation and illegal investigations of students by the “MRT”, directed by the Russian Federation. The applicants are five students, three parents and 10 members of the Romanian / Moldavan language school in Moldova. The “MRT”, which is  in economic  […]

read more

Invalid resignation of an illiterate accused of the right to a lawyer. Infringement of fair trial.

JUDGMENT Akdağ v. Turkey 17.09.2019 (no. 75460/10) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned access to a lawyer in police custody. The applicant alleged that she had confessed to being a member of an illegal organisation after being threatened and ill-treated by the police, without access to a lawyer. Although the Court rejected as inadmissible the […]

read more

Violation of the freedom of expression by not authorizing a producer to reproduce porn movies!

JUDGMENT Pryanishnikov v. Russia 10.09.2019 (no.  25047/05) see here  SUMMARY  License for reproduction of films, freedom of expression and protection of third party rights. The applicant, a producer of erotic films, owns the copyright for their distribution with valid distribution certificates. He requested that the films be distributed by the Russian Ministry of Press and […]

read more

Detention remedies must be capable of being supported in person by the detainee, which constitutes a fundamental guarantee of Article 5 par. 4. An appeal brought by a self-appointed lawyer as long as the defendant was a fugitive without his knowledge does not secure his right to appeal against his deprivation of liberty.

JUDGMENT Rizzotto v. Italy no. 2 05.09.2019 (no. 20983/12) see here  SUMMARY  The case concerned the lawfulness of a pre-trial detention order, and the procedural safeguards secured under Article 5 § 4 (right to speedy review of the lawfulness of detention) of the Convention. The Court found that Mr Rizzotto had never had the opportunity in […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services