JUDGMENT
Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium 10.11.2020 (app. no. 49812/09)
Retroactive application of tax law for extension of limitation period. Fair trial and legislative intervention. Adversarial process and reasonable time.
Deportation of the applicant to Sudan by the Belgian authorities despite the existence of a court order ordering the temporary suspension of the measure and despite the pending request of the court to release him.
A journalist described a high school headmaster as a “neo-Nazi” and a “theoretician of the entity ‘Golden Dawn .” His criminal conviction violated the freedom of expression!
JUDGMENT Mikhail Mironov v. Russia 06.10.2020 (app. no. 58138/09) see here SUMMARY Judge impartiality. Fair trial. Objection of bias. A judge tried one criminal and two civil cases between the same parties and for the same facts. He also adjudicated his objection of exclusion and rejected it. A judge has tried the same parties three […]
JUDGMENT Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania 15.10.2020 (app. no. 80982/12) see here SUMMARY The case concerned proceedings as a result of which the applicants, Pakistani nationals living lawfully in Romania, were declared undesirable and deported. The Court found that the applicants had received only very general information about the legal characterisation of the accusations against […]
JUDGMENT C. v. Croatia 08.10.2020 (app. no. 80117/17) see here SUMMARY Child care and best interests of the child. The applicant is a child of divorced parents. He appealed to the ECtHR, complaining of a violation of his right to respect for his family life (Article 8 of the Convention), because in his parents’ trials […]
JUDGMENT Guz v. Poland 15.10.2020 (app. no. 965/12) see here SUMMARY Criticism of his inspection report by a judge. Disciplinary condemnation for the applicant’s expressions. His disciplinary conviction is a Violation of the judge’s freedom of expression. The applicant, a judge, was not promoted following the negative inspection report prepared by the Inspector Judge and […]
JUDGMENT Β. v. Switzerland 20.10.2020 ( app. no. 78630/12) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the widower’s pension to which the applicant had ceased to be entitled after his younger daughter had reached the age of majority. The Federal Law on Old-Age and Survivors’ Insurance provides that entitlement to a widower’s pension ends when the […]
JUDGMENT Bajčić v. Croatia 08.10.2020 (app. no. 67334/13) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s complaint that he had been tried and punished twice for the same driving offence. In particular, he had first been convicted in minor offence proceedings for speeding and later on in criminal proceedings for causing a fatal road accident. […]
JUDGMENT Faller v. France (app. no. 59389/16) and Steinmetz v. France (App. no. 59389/16) 22.10.2020 see here SUMMARY The case concerned two doctors who complained that they had been convicted by a criminal court for fraud on account of acts for which they had already been punished. The applicants had first been found liable by […]
Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.
Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.