Freedom of expression

Author’s and writers’ convinction of their comments on an article on Islam was excessive and violated the freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Tagiyev and  Huseynov v. Azerbaijan 5.12.2019 (no. 13274/08) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned the applicants’ conviction for inciting religious hatred and hostility with their remarks on Islam in an article they had published in 2006. The Court found in particular that the national courts had not justified why the applicants’ conviction had been […]

read more

Gender quotas in combinations of candidates in national elections. Party exclusion due to gender quota violations in accordance with the ECHR

JUDGMENT Zevnik and others v. Slovenia 5.12.2019  (no. 54893/18) see here  SUMMARY Right to Free Elections and Electoral Legislation. Two of the applicants are political parties that have nominated themselves in the elections. These parties were owned by two of the applicants. Participation in the parties was rejected because there was no required quota of […]

read more

Botox, animal experiments and freedom of expression!

JUDGMENT Schweizerische Radio- und Fernsehgesellschaft and others v. Switzerland 5.12.2019 (no. 68995/13) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the outcome of a complaint concerning a television programme on Botox (botulinum toxin): the domestic authorities had found that the programme had not broached the issue of the animal experiments required for manufacturing the product, and had […]

read more

Large defamation award for moral damage due to public statement against mayor that allegedly controls justice, violated freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Savenko (Limonov) v. Russia  26.11.2019 (no.  29088/08) see here  SUMMARY Political figures, protection, criticism and limits to freedom of expression. In an interview with a radio station, the opposition politician freely expressed his view of the control and influence of justice by the Mayor of Moscow. The latter brought an action for damages for […]

read more
υπερασπιστές ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων

Unjustified continuation and duration of detention (21 months), credibility of witness with motivation for personal gain, conviction of peaceful anti-government protest organizers. The Court finds multiple ECHR violations and condemns!

JUDGMENT Razvozzhayev v. Russia and Ukraine and Udaltsov v. Russia 19.11.2019 (no. 75734/12, 2695/15, 55325/15) see here  SUMMARY The case  concerned the conviction of two men for organising “mass disorder” for their part in May 2012 opposition protests and resultant disturbances in central Moscow, an incident which has been at the centre of several earlier […]

read more

Failure to examine the defendant’s arguments for the credibility of the evidence on which her conviction for a speech was based violated freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Hatice Çoban v. Turkey 29.10.2019 (no.  36226/11) see here  SUMMARY  The case concerned Ms Çoban’s criminal conviction for disseminating propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation on account of a speech she had given. The Court reiterated that the fairness of proceedings and the procedural guarantees afforded were factors to be taken into account […]

read more

Freedom of expression also protects articles about professional matters that are not of public interest

JUDGMENT Herbai v. Hungary 05.11.2019 (no. 11608/15) see here SUMMARY  Web site articles for professionals and freedom of expression. Dismissal of the applicant from his job in the Human Resources Department due to his article on a website dealing with human resources issues. The Court found in particular that the national courts had not sufficiently […]

read more

Failure to examine defendant’s arguments for the credibility of the evidence on which her conviction for a speech was based violated the freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Hatice Çoban v. Turkey 29.10.2019 (no. 36226/11) see here SUMMARY The case concerned Ms Çoban’s criminal conviction for disseminating propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation on account of a speech she had given. The Court reiterated that the fairness of proceedings and the procedural guarantees afforded were factors to be taken into account […]

read more

Criticism of judges by lawyers and conviction of lawyers in the payment of damages. Violation of lawyers’ freedom of expression and protection of the legal function.

JUDGMENT L.P. and Carvalho v. Portugal 08.10.2019 (no. 24845/13 and 49103/15) see here SUMMARY  Criticism of judges by lawyers representing their clients. Lawsuits against lawyers. Freedom of expression for lawyers to defend the interests of their clients and the protection of judges and the judiciary. The case concerned findings of liability against two lawyers for […]

read more

Refusing journalist to take interviews and taking photographes at a reception center for asylum seekers violated freedom of expression.

JUDGMENT Szurovecz v. Hungary 8.10.2019 (no. 15428/16) see here SUMMARY  Media access to reception centers for asylum seekers and freedom of expression. Protection of journalistic research. The applicant, a news website reporter, complained about the authorities’ refusal to allow him to interview and take photos of the asylum seeker reception center, preventing him from recording […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες