JUDGMENT Dainelienė v. Lithuania 16.10.2018 (no. 23532/14) see here SUMMARY The Court found in particular that the Supreme Court’s impartiality had been compromised because the son of the judge presiding over the panel which had decided not to examine the applicant’s appeal on points of law had been the prosecutor in earlier embezzlement proceedings against […]
JUDGMENT Τhiam v. France 18.10.2018 (no. 80018/12) see here SUMMARY Participation of former President of the Republic of France Nicolas Sarkozy as a civilian party in a criminal trial against a citizen. Complaints by the applicant alleging breach of the principle of equality of arms and lack of impartiality of the court due to the […]
JUDGMENT Parol v. Poland 11.10.2018 (no. 65379/13) see here SUMMARY Rejection of an appeal and right of access to a court. The applicant’s appeal is inadmissible on the ground that the copy of the appeal lodged before the competent court was not identical to the original. The Court held that the applicant had exercised due […]
JUDGMENT Kožemiakina v. Lithuania 02.10.2018 (no. 231/15) see here SUMMARY The civil court convicted the applicant of compensation for acts of her minor child, found on the basis of petitions in criminal proceedings in which her son was merely a witness and did not have the status of a party, nor of the accused. The […]
JUDGMENT Mutu and Pechstein v. Switzerland 02.10.2018 (no. 40575/10 and 67474/10) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the lawfulness of proceedings brought by professional athletes before the CAS. The Court found that the CAS arbitration proceedings to which the applicants had been parties were required to offer all the safeguards of a fair hearing, and […]
JUDGMENT Big Brother Watch and others v. The United Kingdom 13.09.2018 (no. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15) see here SUMMARY Complaints by journalists and human rights organizations regarding the massive monitoring of their communications, the exchange of information with foreign governments and the acquisition of communications data by communications service providers. Inadequate supervision of the choice […]
JUDGMENT Kasat v. Turkey 11.09.2018 (no. 61541/09) see here SUMMARY Medical health issue during military service and lack of impartiality on the part of the Supreme Military Administrative Court, which dismissed an action for damages against the army. No violation of the right to privacy due to adequate medical examination of the applicant by the […]
JUDGMENT Vizgirda v. Slovenia 28.08.2018 (no. 59868/08) see here SUMMARY Appointment of a Russian-language interpreter to a Lithuanian citizen without him having adequate understanding of the Russian language. Failure to lodge a complaint or protest by the applicant and his lawyer on the appointment of a Russian interpreter. The Court considered that the absence of […]
JUDGMENT Dadayan v. Armenia 6.09.2018 (no. 14078/12) see here SUMMARY The case concerned criminal proceedings brought against an Armenian national, Garik Dadayan, for aiding and abetting the smuggling of enriched uranium into Georgia. The two smugglers were prosecuted and convicted in Georgia, while Mr Dadayan was prosecuted and convicted in Armenia, essentially on the basis […]
JUDGMENT Cabral v. The Netherlands 28.08.2018 (no. 37617/10) see here SUMMARY Robbery in a supermarket. Unique evidence regarding the guilt of the plaintiff – the accused – the testimony – of his accomplice to the police, which was revoked by the witness in the court of first instance. Appearance of the witness at the Court […]
Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.
Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.