JUDGMENT Hentschel and Stark v. Germany 9.11.2017 (no. 47274/15) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the complaint by two football supporters of having been ill-treated by the police following a match and of the inadequacy of the ensuing investigation. The Court was unable to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the events had happened as described […]
JUDGMENT Judgment of 7.11.2017 Akhlyustin v. Russia (no. 21200/05), Dudchenko v. Russia (no. 37717/05), Konstantin Moskalev v. Russia (no. 59589/10), Moskalev v. Russia (no. 44045/05) SUMMARY All five cases concern secret supervision measures in criminal proceedings without prior judicial approval. In particular, the applicants were monitored through covert video recording at an office, telephone tapping, audio tracking. Also in […]
JUDGMENT Azzolina and others v. Italy 26-10-2017 (no. 28923/09 and 67599/10) Blair and others v. Italy (no. 1442/14, 21319/14 and 21911/14) SUMMARY Genoa July 2001. G8 Summit and mass demonstrations against globalization. Hundreds of injuries, verbal insults, tear gas sprains and serious police violence constitute acts of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment. Insufficient investigation and impunity for […]
JUDGMENT: Hutchinson v. United Kingdom 03.02.2015 (no. 57592/08) see here SUMMARY: The case concerned the complaint by a man serving a whole life sentence for the murder of three members of a family and the rape of another that his sentence amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment as he had no hope of release. The […]
JUDGMENT: RH v. Sweden 10.09.2015 (no. 4601/14) see here SUMMARY: No violation of Article 3 in case of expulsion of the applicant to Somalia. COMMENT Expulsion does not constitute a violation of Article 3 when the background to the complaint is contradictory and its allegations are not substantiated. PROVISION: Article 3 PRINCIPAL FACTS The case […]
JUDGMENT: Lutsenko v. Ukraine 11.06.2015 (no. 29334/11) see here SUMMARY: Inhuman detention conditions of the former Interior Minister of Ukraine and his placement in a metal cage at 80 court meetings. COMMENT Placing of the accused in a metal cage during a court hearing is a degrading treatment. PROVISION: Article 3 PRINCIPAL FACTS The applicant, […]
JUDGMENT: Cestaro v. Italy 07.04.2015 (no. 6884/11) see here SUMMARY: The case concerned events which occurred at the end of the G8 summit in Genoa in July 2001, in a school made available by the municipal authorities to be used as a night shelter by demonstrators. An anti-riot police unit entered the building around midnight […]
JUDGMENT Νalbandyan v. Armenia 31.03.2015 (no. 9935/06, 23339/06) see here SUMMARY: Torture. Intense, continuous beating and use of clobs towards a couple of prisoners during a police investigation. Also, threats against the husband and against the daughter reagarding threats of raping of the latter by police officers in case of non-confession. Infringement of Article 3 […]
JUDGMENT Bataliny v. Russia 23.07. 2015 (no. 10060/07) see here SUMMARY The use of a new drug in a patient for experimental reasons without his consent consists of degrading treatment. Infringement of Article 3 of the ECHR. PROVISION Article 3 PRINCIPAL FACTS The applicants, Vladislav Batalin, born in 1977, and his parents, Igor Batalin and […]
Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.
Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.