Proprietorship

The payment if costs incurred by the State are a disproportionate burden on the applicants. Violation of the right to respect for property

JUDGMENT Bursać and others v. Croatia 28.04.2022 (app. no. 78836/16)  see here SUMMARY The applicants, Bosiljka Bursać, Đuka Damjanović, Nena Damjanović, Danica Dubajić and Milica Vasiljević, are Croatian nationals born between 1940 and 1953 and live in Apatin, Gračac, Srb and Zagreb. In 1995 the applicants’ father was killed by Croatian soldiers during the battle […]

read more

Byer in good faith, bought a public real estate from non-owners. The return of their property to the state without compensation violated their right to property

JUDGMENT Olkhovik and others v. Russia (app. no.  11279/17) and Lidiya Nikitina v. Russia 15.03.2022 (app. no. 8051/20) SUMMARY Both cases concerned the annulment, without compensation, of the applicants’ title to apartments which they had purchased, and the return of the apartments to municipal ownership as unclaimed properties. In the case of Olkhovik the Court […]

read more

Demolition of a house located in a protected area. Attempt to misled the Court. Dismissal of the application

JUDGMENT Povilonis v. Lithuania  07.04.2022 (app. no. 81624/17) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the unlawful construction of a house in a protected area, amid allegations of bribery and trading in influence. The applicant, who had bought the house in 2014, complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the European […]

read more

Revocation of a television station license in order to protect pluralism. Freedom of expression and the right to property were not violated

JUDGMENT NIT S.R.L.v. the Republic of Moldova 05.04.2022  (app. no.  28470/12) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant company’s allegation that its television channel was shut down for being overly critical of the Government and, in particular, whether domestic law could impose an obligation of neutrality and impartiality in the news bulletins of television […]

read more
ιδιοκτησία

The confiscation of goods for 1.5 years after the acquittal violated the right to respect for property

JUDGMENT FU QUAN, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic (application no. 24827/14) 17.03.2022  see here SUMMARY Confiscation of goods. Continuation of confiscation even after the acquittal. Right to respect for property. The managing director as the legal representative of the applicant company was referred for tax evasion. The prosecutor ordered the confiscation of the company’s property […]

read more
ιδιοκτησία

Property confiscation of a businessman and former politician resulting from criminal acts. Non-violation of the ECHR

JUDGMENT Voiculescu v. Romania (app. no.  493/15) and Camelia Rodica Voiculescu v. Romania and 3 other applications (app. no. 502/15)  17.03.2022 SUMMARY The plaintiff in the first case, Dan Voiculescu, is a Romanian national. The applicants in the second case are two Romanian nationals and two Romanian companies. The first applicant is the father of […]

read more
ιδιοκτησία

Freezing of assets in Malta following request by the Kazakh authorities. Disproportionate intervention and violation of respect for property!

JUDGMENT Shorazova v. Malta 03.03.2022 (app. no. 51853/19) see here SUMMARY The applicant, Ms Shorazova was born in Kazakhstan and at the relevant time was married to Rakhat Aliyev, who had previously been married to the daughter of the then president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev and later became his political adversary. The case concerned the […]

read more
ιδιοκτησία

Seizure of shares of a public limited company for offenses committed by the CEO without sufficient justification. Property violation

JUDGMENT Sebeleva and others v. Russia 01.03.2022 (app. no. 42416/18)  see here SUMMARY Confiscation to shareholders of the shares of a public limited company for offenses of the managing director. Property right and proportionality of intervention. The applicants bought shares in a public limited company. The CEO of the company was then accused of distinguished […]

read more

The recognition by the court of a decision of the General Assembly as illegal consists of a genuine examination of the merits of the case despite its non-cancellation. No violation of the right to access to court

JUDGMENT Fischer v. Czech Republic  24.02.2022 (app. no. 24314/13) see here SUMMARY Access to court. Actual examination of the merits and preliminary settlement of a dispute regarding the illegal decision to increase the share capital of the company, despite the rejection, for reasons of legal certainty, of the application for annulment of the settlement. Possibility […]

read more

Failure to enforce court decisions violated the fair trial! The ECtHR awarded the amounts of court decisions that were not executed! Rejection of applications with inaccurate information

JUDGMENT Mastilović and others v. Montenegro 24.02.2022 (app. no. 28754/10) see here SUMMARY Access to court. Non-enforcement of irrevocable court decisions and court compromises. Ratione personae. Inability of the ECtHR to identify some of the applicants. Fair trial. Group application to the ECtHR for violation of a fair trial and the right to property. The […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες