The refusal to grant pension due to nationality is contrary with the ECHR

JUDGMENT  Ribać v. Slovenia  5.12.2017 (no. 57101/10) see here   SUMMARY  Pension. Refusal by the authorities to grant pension for a specific period to a person who did not have the Slovenian citizenship at that time. Double violation of the ECHR. Infringement of the prohibition of discrimination and the right to property protection. PROVISIONS  Article  14 […]

read more

Non execution of decisions of national courts violate the rights of fair trial and the respect for property

JUDGMENT  Kunić and others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 14.11.2017 (no. 68955/12 ), Spahić and others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina  14.11.2017 (no.  20514/15 ) SUMMARY  Non-execution of irrevocable decisions by national courts. Thirty-two Bosniak and Herzegovina citizens filed a complaint before the ECtHR for protesting against the irreconcilable internal decisions concerning them.  Over the same issue there are more than 400 appeals […]

read more

Non execution of judgments violate the right to a fair trial and the right to property

JUDGMENT  Mazzeo v. Italy 5/10/2017 (no. 32269/09) see here SUMMARY  Failure to execute a court order. Condemnation of Italy for non-execution of the decision both for violating the fair trial and for violating the respect for property. PROVISIONS  Article 6 par.1 Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol PRINCIPAL FACTS The applicants, Saverio Cosimo Mazzeo, […]

read more

The right to peaceful enjoyment of property is breached by the state’s demand for return of property to the public with compensation of EUR 4.34!

JUDGMENT  Činga v. Lithuania 31-10-2017 (no. 69419/13) see here         SUMMARY  Judicial decision to return land to the state, although it contained all the operational and auxiliary facilities (water, gas, and power meter) needed for the smooth operation of the house. Insufficient compensation for the purchase of a comparable plot. The errors of […]

read more

Reducing benefits to a degree of survival impedes the right to property

JUDGMENT  Krajnc v. Slovenia 31-10-2017  (no. 38775/14) see here SUMMARY  Truck driver ceases to work due to epileptic seizures. An excessively reduced disability allowance, results in a serious survival problem. Infringement of the right to property protection PROVISION Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol PRINCIPAL FACTS  The applicant, Slavko Krajnc, is a Slovenian national […]

read more

The right to property of citizens after the fall of the Communist regime in Romania

JUDGMENT  Dickmann and Gion v. Romania  24-10-2017 (no. 10346/03 and 10893/04) see here SUMMARY  Mechanism for restoring assets after the fall of the communist regime. Ineffectiveness of procedures under the legislation on reimbursement or compensation for legal heirs. Infringement of property protection. PROVISION  Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol PRINCIPAL FACTS  The applicant in […]

read more

Government interventions on pensions, in view of the sustainability of the pension system

DECISION  Fábián v. Hungary 05/09/2017 (no. 78117/13) see here SUMMARY The suspension of a pensioner’s pension due to his work in the public sector. Justification for suspending the pension on grounds of protection of the public fund and ensuring the long-term viability of the Hungarian pension system. The applicant had not been significantly burdened since […]

read more

Reducing pensions in a time of financial crisis does not violate the right to property protection

JUDGMENT Mockienė v. Lithuania 27-07-2017 (no. 75916/13) see here   SUMMARY The applicant was an officer and received a retirement pension after her retirement from the Prison Division in January 2004. On 1 January 2010, a provisional law came into force which cut and reduced various social care benefits, including pensions, during the economic crisis. The […]

read more
δίκαιη δίκη

The State’s obligation to comply with binding rulings and the protection shield of the ECtHR

JUDGMENT Panorama Ltd and Miličić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 25-07-2017 (no. 69997/10 και 74793/11) see here  SUMMARY  The applicants in this case are Panorama Ltd, a limited liability company based in the Brčko Region, and Đuro Miličić, a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The case concerned the non-execution of internal irrevocable judgments in the applicants’ […]

read more

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services