Private life

Imposition of disciplinary sanctions on a judicial officer, due to her critical public statements against judges and the government. Violation of her right to freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria 19.10.2021 (app. no. 40072/13) see here SUMMARY The case concerned two sets of disciplinary proceedings against the applicant, who had been a judge and the President of the Bulgarian Union of Judges at the relevant time. The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) ordered a reduction of her salary, followed by her […]

read more

Involuntary hospitalization and compulsory medication for psychiatric patients without a recent medical evaluation! Violation of personal freedom and privacy

JUDGMENT R.D. and I.M.D. v. Romania 12.10.2021 (app. no. 35402/14) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicants’ non-voluntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital for the purpose of compelling them to undergo medical treatment, and the obligation to follow that treatment. The Court noted that the relevant psychiatric forensic medical reports in respect of the […]

read more

The dead have also the right to be forgotten!

JUDGMENT M.L. v. Slovakia  14.10.2021 (app. no. 34159/17) see here SUMMARY The case concerned three 2006 newspaper articles about the applicant’s son – a former parish priest – after his passing, and the ensuing court proceedings. The articles had combined certain elements from the criminal case files of the applicant’s son’s convictions with frivolous and […]

read more

Long lasting road congestion due to highway construction! Disruption of the peaceful enjoyment of their home!

JUDGMENT Kapa and others v. Poland 14.10.2021 (app. no. 75031/13, 75282/13, 75286/13 and 75292/13) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the rerouting of traffic by the applicants’ house during the construction of a motorway, and the applicants’ attempts to rectify the situation via the authorities. The Court found in particular that the authorities had knowingly […]

read more

18,000 pre filled application forms before the ECtHR by the French for the imposition of a health pass for coronavirus. They were all rejected as unacceptable!

JUDGMENT Zambrano v. France 07.10.2021 (app. no. 41994/21) see here SUMMARY The case concerned a university lecturer, Guillaume Zambrano, who complained about the “health pass” introduced in France in 2021 and who created a movement to protest against it. On his website, he suggests that visitors complete a pre-filled form in order to increase the […]

read more

Notice of application before Court concerning compulsory vaccination of certain workers imposed by French law on health crisis

NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF FRANCE  see here SUMMARY The European Court of Human Rights notified the French Government of the application in Thevenon v. France (App. No. 46061/21) and requested observations on its admissibility and merits. The case concerns the compulsory vaccination against COVID-19 imposed on certain professions as in the case […]

read more

Cyberviolence against a woman by her partner! Insufficient investigation and non-protection of the victim. Violation of privacy

JUDGMENT Volodina v. Russia 14.09.2021 (no. 2) (app.  no. 40419/19) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s allegation that the Russian authorities had failed to protect her against the repeated cyberviolence of her partner who had created fake profiles in her name, published her intimate photos, tracked her movements and sent her death threats […]

read more

The use of the applicant’s emails from a dating site, as evidence in a child custody trial, did not infringe on the right to privacy

JUDGMENT Μ.P. v. Portugal 07.09.2021 (app. no. 27516/14)  see here SUMMARY The case concerned an applicant who complained about the fact that her former husband had not been punished in criminal proceedings by the Portuguese courts for having accessed emails that she had exchanged on a casual dating site and for submitting them in evidence […]

read more

Prohibition of Supreme Judges from participating in the Supreme Court by a law issued after their appointment! No right of appeal. Violation of respect for privacy and access to court!

JUDGMENT Gumenyuk and others v. Ukraine 22.07.2021 (app. no. 11423/19) see here SUMMARY Judges’ private life. Prohibition by law for supreme judges to participate in the Supreme Court without being fired. The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court was determined by a competition, in which the already appointed supreme judges had to participate. Lack […]

read more

Publication in a newspaper of private information and images secretly obtained by a journalist acting as the candidate surrogate mother. Violation of privacy

JUDGMENT Hájovský v. Slovakia 01.07.2021 (app. no. 7796/16) see here SUMMARY Notice of finding a surrogate mother on behalf of the applicant. A journalist introduced as the surrogate mother candidate and secretly recorded his conversations, as a result of which she became the subject of a TV show. Publication in a newspaper of private information […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες