Topics

ιδιοκτησία

The presumption of innocence was violated when a non convicted due to a statute of limitations for tax evasion was later sentenced to compensation on the grounds that he had committed the same crime!

JUDGMENT Agapov v. Russia 06.10.2020  (app. no. 52464/15) see here   SUMMARY Tax evasion, presumption of innocence and protection of property. The applicant, in his capacity as CEO of the company, was charged with tax evasion as the company had failed to pay VAT. The prosecutor did not prosecute the statute of limitations, but the State […]

read more

Arbitrary accusation of extremist action due to unclear legal framework. Violation of freedom of expression. Indefinite criminal provision

JUDGMENT Karastelev and others v. Russia 06.10.2020 (app. no. 16435/10) see here SUMMARY The case  concerned complaints brought by the chief officer and deputy chief officer of a human rights NGO about anti-extremist legislation in Russia. The Russian authorities had found that a poster they had displayed during a protest against a law on minors […]

read more

Administrative dissolution of far-right organizations after a student’s death. Strasbourg welcomes their dissolution

JUDGMENT Ayoub and others v. France 08.10.2020 (app. no. 77400/14, 34532/15 and 34550/15) see here SUMMARY The cases concerned the administrative dissolution of three extreme right-wing entities: a de facto group (the Troisième Voie association and its security squad) and two associations (L’Oeuvre française and Jeunesses nationalistes). The Court held that the dissolution of the […]

read more

Special Appeal before the President of the Republic, who has not responded for 14 years! The action for unjustified delay is inadmissible because it did not concern a court procedure

JUDGMENT Mediani v. Italy 01.10.2020 (aoo. no. 11036/14) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned the length of proceedings relating to a special appeal to the President of the Republic (ricorso straordinario al Presidente della Repubblica). Mr Mediani, who had lodged his appeal in 2004 in order to challenge the decision to revoke his advancement to […]

read more

Imposition of a minimum fine that was not criminal in nature and criminal conviction. Non-violation of the principle ne bis in idem

JUDGMENT Prina v. Romania 01.10.2020 (app. no. 37697/13) see here SUMMARY The case concerned two penalties imposed on the applicant for acts allegedly committed in his capacity as head of the city’s technical department: an administrative fine and a suspended prison sentence. The Court reiterated that the first paragraph of Article 4 of Protocol No. […]

read more

The criminal conviction of a protester for giving a speech against the police, based on provisions without the necessary predictability, violated his freedom of expression.

JUDGMENT Bozan v. Turkey 29.09.2020 (app. no. 56816/10 and 4175/11) see here SUMMARY Criminal conviction and freedom of expression. Demonstration in memory of fourteen members of the PKK who were killed by police. When the protesters stayed silent for a minute as a tribute to the dead, the plaintiff spoke out against the police actions […]

read more

Condemnation of a citizen for sending two messages to a friend promoting a terrorist organization. Violation of freedom of expression

JUDGMENT SÜER v. Turkey 29-09-2020 (app. no. 77711/11) see here  SUMMARY Freedom of expression. Sending a message to a friend in fn the name of a terrorist organization. The applicant was accused of propaganda in favor of the PKK terrorist organization because he sent two messages to a friend, praising her. He was sentenced to […]

read more

The ECHR intervenes with the granting of interim measures to end Armenia-Azerbaijan hostilities in order to protect civilians

Decision for Interim Measures of Armenia v. Azerbaijan of 30.09.2020 (App. no. 42521/20) PRINCIPAL FACTS The European Court of Human Rights received on the 28-9-2020 a request for interim measure lodged by Armenia against Azerbaijan, in which the Armenian Government requested the Court to indicate to the Azerbaijani Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules […]

read more

The exclusion of the non-biological father from communication with the child, with whom he had developed strong ties, violated the right to family life

JUDGMENT Fatkhutdinov v. Russia 29.09.2020  (App. no. 36335/18) see here SUMMARY Best interests of the child and parental care. Deprivation of parental care f a minor child by the applicant, who was deemed not to be his biological father, based on his refusal to undergo a DNA test and the testimony of a witness. The […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες