Article 8

Violation of the rights of a biological father regarding his son’s adoption by another man. Conviction for violation of Article 8 of the ECHR

JUDGMENT I.V. v. Estonia 10.10.2023 (app. no. 37031/21) see here SUMMARY The case concerned a father’s attempt to contest the adoption of his biological son by another man in Estonia, against the background of paternity proceedings in Latvia. The Court stressed that although this was a cross-border case, the Court was examining only Estonia’s responsibility. […]

read more

The state is obliged to ensure parent-child communication in case of lack of cooperation of the separated parents for communication!

JUDGMENT Beluch v. Poland  28.09.2023 (app. no. 4065/21) see here SUMMARY The applicant’s daughter X. was born in January 2010. The applicant divorced her mother M.M. shortly after the birth of their daughter in March 2010. In May 2010, the applicant asked the Regional Court to regulate the rights of communication with X. due to […]

read more

Prohibition on exporting gametes and embryos to a country which authorises posthumous insemination did not breach the right to respect for private life protected by Article 8 of the Convention

JUDGMENT Baret and Caballero v. France 14.09.2023  (app. no. 22296/20 and 37138/20) see here SUMMARY The cases concerned the prohibition on exporting the sperm of the first applicant’s deceased husband and the embryos created by the second applicant with her deceased husband to Spain, a country where posthumous conception was permitted. The Court found in […]

read more

Authorities’ refusal to reveal donors’ gamete in assisted reproduction births did not violate privacy

JUDGMENT Gauvin–Fournis and Silliau v. France 07.09.2023 (app. no. 21424/16) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the inability, alleged by the applicants, who were born in the 1980s by means of medically assisted procreation (MAP) using third-party donors, to access information concerning the respective donors. This situation had lasted until 1 September 2022, when a […]

read more

Banning of the prefix “von” in applicants’ surnames, after a long period of use. Violation of respect for privacy

JUDGMENT Künsberg Sarre v. Austria  17.01.2023 (app.  no. 19475/20) see here SUMMARY The applicants are all members of the same family (two brothers, a husband and a son). They have the surname “von Künsberg Sarre”, which was first used by their distant ancestor when he went to America in 1961. The domestic authorities ex officio […]

read more

Dismissal of judges for their vote in a decision! Violation of privacy and fair trial

JUDGMENT Ovcharenko and Kolos v. Ukraine 12.01.2023 (app. no. 27276/15 and 33692/15) see here SUMMARY Private life. Dismissal of judges of the Constitutional Court by Parliament for participation in a decision, without a clear interpretation of the imputed “breach of oath” and the scope of their immunity. Judicial review of Parliament’s decision to dismiss them […]

read more

Medical operation to remove a kidney without the patient’s informed consent. Violation of the right to respect for private life

JUDGMENT Mayboroda v. Ukraine 13.04.2023 (app. no. 14709/07) see here SUMMARY Medical intervention and informed consent. Privacy protection. The applicant underwent surgery during which one of her kidneys was urgently removed to save her life due to internal bleeding. She had not provided written consent for the operation in question, nor had she been informed […]

read more

The lack of legal recognition of same-sex couples violates the ECHR. Providing legal recognition and protection to same-sex couples does not harm traditional families

JUDGMENT Maymulakhin and Markiv v. Ukraine 01.06.2023 (app. no. 75135/14) see here SUMMARY The applicants are a same-sex couple living in Ukraine. They requested a marriage license but the authorities refused on the grounds that their country’s legislation does not allow any type of union for same-sex couples. The ECtHR reiterated its longstanding position that […]

read more

Denial of transgender person’s request to change gender identity and name. Violation of respect for privacy due to lack of regulatory framework

JUDGMENT R.K. v. Hungary 22.06.2023 (app. no. 54006/20) see here SUMMARY Private life. The applicant, a transgender person, submitted a request to change his “gender” and name, attaching medical reports from a specialist clinical psychologist, psychiatrist and gynecologist as required by national law. His request was rejected on the grounds that he did not meet […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες