Article 6 – Par. 1

The sentencing decision, which was based not only on the testimony of a minor witness but also on other evidence, did not violate the overall legal nature of the criminal proceedings.

JUDGMENT P. v. Greece 14.05.2020 (no. 78085/12) see here SUMMARY Right to hear a defendant accused of sexually abusing his son. Right of examination of witnesses. Complaint before the ECtHR about the reading by the national courts of the child’s testimony before the Investigator, which confirmed the sexual abuse. According to the applicant, the testimony […]

read more

Insufficient justification of court decisions and failure to respond to the parties’ allegations violated the fair trial

JUDGMENT Mazahir Jafarov v. Azerbaijan 02.04.2020 (no. 39331/09) see here SUMMARY Right to be heard. Rejection of the courts to return the use of the applicant’s apartment to him by removing it from his ex-wife and children, in exchange for the payment of compensation on his behalf.  Insufficient justification for domestic court decisions. According to […]

read more

Η επιδίκαση υπερβολικών ποσών για δικαστικό ένσημο και τέλη παραβίασε την πρόσβαση σε δικαστήριο! Τα δικαστικά τέλη πρέπει να είναι ανάλογα με την δυνατότητα του διαδίκου να τα καταβάλει!

ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗ Chorbadzhiyski και Krasteva κατά Βουλγαρίας της 02.04.2020 (αριθ.προσφ. 8938/07 και 41891/07) βλ. εδώ ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ Πρόσβαση στο δικαστήριο. Υπερβολικά δικαστικά τέλη. Οι προσφεύγοντες  καταδικάστηκαν  να καταβάλουν για δικαστικά τέλη περισσότερο από το μισό του επιδικασθέντος ποσού (μαζί με τόκους). Απουσία προβλεψιμότητας των δικαστικών τελών. Οι προσφεύγοντες άσκησαν αγωγή αποζημίωσης για αστική ευθύνη εναντίον του Δήμου […]

read more

Judicial decisions must be enforced. Inaction of the authorities regarding the non-execution and non-delivery of the property to the owner violated the fair trial

JUDGMENT Nikoloudakis v. Greece  26.3.2020 ( no. 35322/12) see here  SUMMARY Rule of law and enforcement of judgments. The applicants, by irrevocable judgments, were recognized as owners of a property owned by their mother but had been encroached upon by third parties and ordered to return the property to them and demolish the illegal buildings […]

read more

Journalist’s condemnation for gloryfying violence and the kidnappers did not violated the freedom of expression

JUDGMENT Altıntaş v. Turkey 10.03.2020 (no.  50495/08) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned a judicial fine imposed on Mr Altıntaş for an article published in 2007 in his periodical Tokat Demokrat, describing the perpetrators of the “Kızıldere events”, among others as “idols of the youth”. The events in question took place in March 1972, when […]

read more

Red card to Platini from Strasbourg! The penalty imposed on him was proportional

JUDGMENT Platini v. Switzerland 05.03.2020 (no. 526/18) see here SUMMARY The case concerned Michel Platini, a former professional football player, president of UEFA and vice-president of FIFA. Disciplinary proceedings had been brought against him in respect of a salary “supplement” of 2 million Swiss francs (CHF), received in 2011 in the context of a verbal […]

read more
απαλλοτρίωση

Disciplinary proceedings against a notary for the transfer of public property to a monastery. The fair trial was not infringed

JUDGMENT Peleki v. Greece 05.03.2020  (no.  69291/12) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned disciplinary proceedings against the applicant, a notary by profession, after she was instrumental in the conveyance of State property to a monastery. The Court found that sufficiently thorough judicial scrutiny had been exercised by the Court of Appeal, which had remedied the […]

read more

Deprivation of the right to choose a defense lawyer and the national court’s formalism in the late appeal violated the ECHR

JUDGMENT Lobzhanidze and Peradze v. Georgia 27.02.2020 (no. 21447/11 and 35839/11) see here  SUMMARY Evidence, Appointment of Attorney, Appeal and Fair Trial. The applicants were convicted of forgery for a virtual sale of real estate. In addition, the first applicant was charged with the offense of bribery of judicial officers for attempting to influence a […]

read more

The Court intervenes on the substance of the criminal case. Non-examination of evidence, insufficient reasoning and lack of impartiality: Unfair trial

JUDGMENT Paixão Moreira Sá Fernandes v. Portugal 25.2.2020 (no. 78108/14) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s conviction for recording a conversation with a businessman who was offering him money to ensure that his brother, a Lisbon City Councillor, would withdraw his opposition to a contract that the businessman wished to conclude with the […]

read more

Systematically restricting the legal representation of the suspect in the pre trial proceedings: breach of the fair trial

JUDGMENT Mehmet Zeki Çelebi v. Turkey  28.1.2020  (no. 27582/07) see here  SUMMARY Fair trial and representation by a lawyer. The applicant was arrested on charges of involvement in terrorist organization, extortion and premeditated homicide. At the pretrial stage he requested legal representation but was not required by law and his apology was in the absence […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Decline all Services
Accept all Services