Article 3

Detention conditions in a migrant center in Turkey for a mother and her three young children. Conviction by the Court.

JUDGMENT G.B. and others v. Turkey 17.10.2019 (no. 4633/15) see here  SUMMARY The case concerned the immigration detention of a mother and her three young children pending their deportation from Turkey. They had been released after nearly four months following a series of challenges about the lawfulness of their detention before the domestic courts. The […]

read more

The domestic remedies available to detained migrants in emergency reception centers in Greece were neither accessible nor sufficient.

JUDGMENT Kaak and others v. Greece 3/10/2019 (no. 34215/16) see here SUMMARY The case concerned the conditions of detention of Syrian, Afghan and Palestinian nationals in the “hotspots” of Vial and Souda (Greece), and the lawfulness of their detention in those camps. The Court considered that the authorities had done all that could reasonably be […]

read more

The mentally ill offender cannot be deported without sufficient guarantees of effective access to appropriate care.

JUDGMENT Savran v. Denmark 1/10/2019 (no. 57467/15) see here   SUMMARY The case concerned the applicant’s complaint that owing to his mental health his rights would be violated if he were to be returned to Turkey. The Court found in particular that psychiatrists had recommended that the applicant receive close monitoring and follow-up in order […]

read more
φυλακές

Conviction of a deceased (!) violates the fair trial. Presumption of innocence guarantees lack of criminal responsibility after the defendant’s death.

JUDGMENT Magnitskiyiy and others v. Russia  27.08.2019 (no. 32631/09 and 53799/12) see here SUMMARY  Conviction of the deceased. Criminal responsibility does not remain after the defendant death. This dictates the presumption of innocence. Conviction of the accused after his death violates the right to a fair trial as criminal proceedings require the defendant to participate. […]

read more
φυλακές

Constant video surveillance of a prisoner constitutes inhuman and degrading treatment. The trial in camera must be reasoned, otherwise it infringes the fair trial.

JUDGMENT Izmestyev v. Russia (application no. 74141/10) of 27.08.2019 see here SUMMARY Video surveillance of a life prisoner with security cameras on a 24-hour basis, restrictions on his family visits, prolonged detention and trial in camera. The European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of […]

read more

Violent beating of a citizen by police officers for personal reasons! Physical violence constitutes inhuman and degrading treatment.

JUDGMENT  Gülkanat v. Turkey 09.07.2019 (no.38176/08) see here SUMMARY  Ill- treatment of a citizen by police officers  and cover up by senior officers. The applicant, who had not committed a crime, was led by police officers in a wooded area and was beaten for supposedly  harassing the sister in law of an officer.  When transferred to […]

read more

Wild beating of suspect during police interrogation for attempted rape of a minor. 8 years of ineffective investigation by the authorities regarding the conditions of the injuries constitutes inhumane and degrading treatment.

JUDGMENT  Gogaladze v. Georgia 18.07.2019 (no.8971/10) see here SUMMARY  Ill -treatment of a suspect for the offense of raping a minor by  police officers. The applicant was arrested and interrogated for the offense of the rape of a minor. Two months after the incident and while he was in pre –trial detention, he complained of […]

read more

The non-extradition of a murder suspect from Belgium to Spain did not have a sufficient real basis.

JUDGMENT  Romeo Castaño v. Belgium 09.07.2019 (no. 8351/17) see here SUMMARY  Not extradiction of a murder suspect. Incomplete research for extradiction. The negative decision did not have a sufficient real basis. Infringement of the procedural aspect of the right to life. The applicants complained that their right to effective investigation had been violated due to […]

read more

In absentia conviction. Non violation of fair trial as the absence of the convicted from the court was his choice. His detention with a view to extradition without a court order violated his right to freedom and security.

JUDGMENT Kislov v. Russia 09.07.2019 (no. 3598/10) see here   SUMMARY  Passive bribery of a civil servant. His in absentia conviction for passive bribery and forgery. Provisional detention in Russia with a view to extradition to Belarus without a court order. The applicant was accused of passive bribery of an official and was convicted in absentia […]

read more
ECHRCaseLaw
Close Popup

Χρησιμοποιούμε cookies για να σας προσφέρουμε καλύτερη εμπειρία στο διαδίκτυο. Συμφωνώντας, αποδέχεστε τη χρήση των cookies σύμφωνα με την Πολιτική Cookies.

Close Popup
Privacy Settings saved!
Ρυθμίσεις Απορρήτου

Όταν επισκέπτεστε μία ιστοσελίδα, μπορεί να λάβει κάποιες βασικές πληροφορίες από τον browser σας, κατά βάση υπό τη μορφή cookies. Εδώ μπορείτε να ρυθμίσετε τη συγκατάθεσή σας σε όλα αυτά.

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources, so we can measure and improve the performance of our site.

Google Analytics
We track anonymized user information to improve our website.
  • _ga
  • _gid
  • _gat

Απορρίψη όλων των υπηρεσιών
Save
Δέχομαι όλες τις υπηρεσίες